same population growth rate as the native-born population does. The number
of young native-born individuals at period t :
Lt = Lt-1(1 + n) + γt-1Lt-1 (1 + m)
(5)
In addition, immigrants are also assumed to contribute to, or benefit from,
the social security system in the same way as the native-born. Because the social
security system redistributes income from the young to the old, the balanced
government budget constraint implies:
bt+1Lt(1 + γt) = τ t+1wt+1lt+1Lt+1(1 + γt+1) (6)
Re-arranging the expression yields:
bt+1 =
τ t+ιwt+ιlt+ι[(1 + n) + Yt(1 + m)](1 + Yt+1)
(1 + γt)
(7)
Labor-leisure decisions of young individuals are derived, as usual, from utility
maximization, taking the prices and policy choices as given:
ltΨ = wt (1 - τt)
(8)
Substituting for bt , bt+1and lt in equations (7) and (8) into equation (1), the
indirect utility functions of the young individual can be written as:
Ψ
Vy(wt,τt,τt+1,wt+1) = Log[ψ+1 wtlt(1 - τt)] +
(9)
such that,
βLog[
τt+ιwt+ιlt+ι [1 + n + γt (1 + m)](1 + γt+ι)
(1+ Yt)
ltΨ = wt (1 - τt)
ltΨ+1 = wt+1 (1 - τt+1)
(10)
(11)
Substituting for bt in equations (7) into equation (2), yields the indirect utility
functions of the old individual:
V o(bt) =
τ twtlt[(1+ n)+ γt-1(1 + m)](1 + γt)
(1+ Yt-1)
(12)
Note that the old individual prefers that the immigration quotas will be as
large as possible, because more immigration would raise the total amount of tax