Table 4. OLS Estimates of labor productivity growth rates (in percentage points).
Dependent variable |
Any innovation |
_______Product_______ |
_______Process_______ | |||
Coefficient |
Robust |
Coefficient |
Robust |
Coefficient |
Robust | |
Innovative firms_______ |
15.12** |
7.094 |
2.588 |
5.954 |
-Ш- |
6.006 |
∆2 ln K- *Innov 2 L |
0.2587*** |
0.008 |
7___⅛⅛⅛ 0.292 |
0.009 |
7 ~ Ш |
0.009 |
. K. . ∆ 2 ln —— *nonInnov 2 L ~ Lit |
0.01 |
0.015 |
0.069 |
0.011 |
0.019 |
0.012 |
Age* Innov__________ |
-0.283*** |
0.069 |
7__⅝*⅛ -0.286 |
0.085 |
7 " _ ⅝*⅛ -0.366 |
0.078 |
Age*non Innov______ |
0.091 |
0.125 |
-0.109 . |
0.084 |
0.066 |
0.091 |
Temporary *Innov_____ |
-0.095*** |
0.035 |
-0.073* |
0.041 |
7 _ ⅝*⅛ -0.106 |
0.039 |
Temporary *non_Innov |
-0.199*** |
0.046 |
--7—----_ ⅜⅜⅜---- -0.213 |
0.037 |
---7______⅜⅜⅜----- -0.197 |
0.039 |
Large_______________ |
Σ $ -1.94 |
1.113 |
-1.894* |
1.108 |
-1.081 |
1.096 |
Medium___________ |
* — ,*** -5.74 |
0.876 |
--Σ—_ _-⅜⅜⅜---- -5.965 |
0.871 |
________⅜⅜⅜---- -4.970 |
0.864 |
Group______________ |
___⅛⅛⅛ 2.86_______ |
0.680 |
7 __⅛⅛⅛ 3.199 |
0.679 |
Z .„*** 2.48 |
0.675 |
Constant_____________ |
2.61 |
10.19 |
14.019 |
8.799 |
3.637 |
9.216 |
Industry dummies_____ |
yes |
yes |
yes | |||
Region dummies_____ |
yes |
yes |
yes | |||
Wald test for equality o: |
coefficients ' |
between Innovative and non Innovative_________________ | ||||
Capital-lab or ratio |
[0.000] |
[0.000] |
[0.000] | |||
Age______________ |
[0.0085] |
[0.138] |
[0.0003] | |||
Share of temporary |
[0.069] |
[0.011] |
[0.0946] | |||
Chow test F__________ |
[0.000] |
[0.000] |
[0.000] | |||
Adj R2_______________ |
0.154 |
0.157 |
0.171 | |||
N____________ |
7977 |
7977 |
7977 |
Note: * 10%, ** 5%, *** 1% level of significance, p-values in brackets. Size, areas, industry and group dummies
are included in all regressions.
Table 4 shows the OLS coefficients and robust standard errors of the estimates of labor productivity
growth rates (two-year rates) on our variables of interest, interacted with the group dummies.
“Innov” refers to the group of firms introducing an innovation in 2001-2003, while “non_Innov”
refers to the group of the non innovative firms. Column 1 and 2 refer to firms which have
introduced any - hence either product or process - innovation. Column 3 and 4 refer to firms which
have introduced product innovation only and column 5 and 6 refer to firms having introduced
process innovation only. All the regressions include standard control variables such as size,
geographical areas, industry dummies, as well as the dummy that takes a value of one for firms
17
More intriguing information
1. Evolution of cognitive function via redeployment of brain areas2. Sex differences in the structure and stability of children’s playground social networks and their overlap with friendship relations
3. Evidence on the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Three European Regions
4. Markets for Influence
5. The name is absent
6. Word searches: on the use of verbal and non-verbal resources during classroom talk
7. Experimental Evidence of Risk Aversion in Consumer Markets: The Case of Beef Tenderness
8. Social Cohesion as a Real-life Phenomenon: Exploring the Validity of the Universalist and Particularist Perspectives
9. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
10. The name is absent