Experience, Innovation and Productivity - Empirical Evidence from Italy's Slowdown

Table 4. OLS Estimates of labor productivity growth rates (in percentage points).

Dependent variable K ∆ ₂ln — ² L Lit	Any innovation		_______Product_______		_______Process_______
Dependent variable K ∆ ₂ln — ² L Lit	Coefficient	Robust Std. Err.	Coefficient	Robust Std. Err.	Coefficient	Robust Std. Err.

Innovative firms_______	15.12**	7.094	2.588	5.954	-Ш- 17.24	6.006
∆₂ ln K- *Innov ² L Lit	0.2587***	0.008	7___⅛⅛⅛ 0.292	0.009	7 ~ Ш 0.304	0.009
. K. . ∆ ₂ ln —— *nonInnov ² L ~ Lit	0.01	0.015	0.069	0.011	0.019	0.012
Age* Innov__________	-0.283***	0.069	7__⅝*⅛ -0.286	0.085	7 " _ ⅝*⅛ -0.366	0.078
Age*non Innov______	0.091	0.125	-0.109 .	0.084	0.066	0.091
Temporary *Innov_____	-0.095***	0.035	-0.073*	0.041	7 _ ⅝*⅛ -0.106	0.039
Temporary *non_Innov	-0.199***	0.046	--7—----_ ⅜⅜⅜---- -0.213	0.037	---7______⅜⅜⅜----- -0.197	0.039
Large_______________	Σ $ -1.94	1.113	-1.894*	1.108	-1.081	1.096
Medium___________	* — ,*** -5.74	0.876	--Σ—_ _-⅜⅜⅜---- -5.965	0.871	________⅜⅜⅜---- -4.970	0.864
Group______________	___⅛⅛⅛ 2.86_______	0.680	7 __⅛⅛⅛ 3.199	0.679	Z .„*** 2.48	0.675
Constant_____________	2.61	10.19	14.019	8.799	3.637	9.216
Industry dummies_____	yes		yes		yes
Region dummies_____	yes		yes		yes

Wald test for equality o:	coefficients '	between Innovative and non Innovative_________________
Capital-lab or ratio	[0.000]		[0.000]		[0.000]
Age______________	[0.0085]		[0.138]		[0.0003]
Share of temporary	[0.069]		[0.011]		[0.0946]
Chow test F__________	[0.000]		[0.000]		[0.000]
Adj R²_______________	0.154		0.157		0.171
N____________	7977		7977		7977

Note: * 10%, ** 5%, *** 1% level of significance, p-values in brackets. Size, areas, industry and group dummies
are included in all regressions.

Table 4 shows the OLS coefficients and robust standard errors of the estimates of labor productivity
growth rates (two-year rates) on our variables of interest, interacted with the group dummies.
“Innov” refers to the group of firms introducing an innovation in 2001-2003, while “non_Innov”
refers to the group of the non innovative firms. Column 1 and 2 refer to firms which have
introduced any - hence either product or process - innovation. Column 3 and 4 refer to firms which
have introduced product innovation only and column 5 and 6 refer to firms having introduced
process innovation only. All the regressions include standard control variables such as size,
geographical areas, industry dummies, as well as the dummy that takes a value of one for firms

More intriguing information

1. Conditions for learning: partnerships for engaging secondary pupils with contemporary art.
2. A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian “Explanations” in Economics
3. ESTIMATION OF EFFICIENT REGRESSION MODELS FOR APPLIED AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH
4. Luce Irigaray and divine matter
5. Publication of Foreign Exchange Statistics by the Central Bank of Chile
6. Review of “The Hesitant Hand: Taming Self-Interest in the History of Economic Ideas”
7. Changing spatial planning systems and the role of the regional government level; Comparing the Netherlands, Flanders and England
8. Population ageing, taxation, pensions and health costs, CHERE Working Paper 2007/10
9. The name is absent
10. Auctions in an outcome-based payment scheme to reward ecological services in agriculture – Conception, implementation and results