Table 4. OLS Estimates of labor productivity growth rates (in percentage points).
Dependent variable |
Any innovation |
_______Product_______ |
_______Process_______ | |||
Coefficient |
Robust |
Coefficient |
Robust |
Coefficient |
Robust | |
Innovative firms_______ |
15.12** |
7.094 |
2.588 |
5.954 |
-Ш- |
6.006 |
∆2 ln K- *Innov 2 L |
0.2587*** |
0.008 |
7___⅛⅛⅛ 0.292 |
0.009 |
7 ~ Ш |
0.009 |
. K. . ∆ 2 ln —— *nonInnov 2 L ~ Lit |
0.01 |
0.015 |
0.069 |
0.011 |
0.019 |
0.012 |
Age* Innov__________ |
-0.283*** |
0.069 |
7__⅝*⅛ -0.286 |
0.085 |
7 " _ ⅝*⅛ -0.366 |
0.078 |
Age*non Innov______ |
0.091 |
0.125 |
-0.109 . |
0.084 |
0.066 |
0.091 |
Temporary *Innov_____ |
-0.095*** |
0.035 |
-0.073* |
0.041 |
7 _ ⅝*⅛ -0.106 |
0.039 |
Temporary *non_Innov |
-0.199*** |
0.046 |
--7—----_ ⅜⅜⅜---- -0.213 |
0.037 |
---7______⅜⅜⅜----- -0.197 |
0.039 |
Large_______________ |
Σ $ -1.94 |
1.113 |
-1.894* |
1.108 |
-1.081 |
1.096 |
Medium___________ |
* — ,*** -5.74 |
0.876 |
--Σ—_ _-⅜⅜⅜---- -5.965 |
0.871 |
________⅜⅜⅜---- -4.970 |
0.864 |
Group______________ |
___⅛⅛⅛ 2.86_______ |
0.680 |
7 __⅛⅛⅛ 3.199 |
0.679 |
Z .„*** 2.48 |
0.675 |
Constant_____________ |
2.61 |
10.19 |
14.019 |
8.799 |
3.637 |
9.216 |
Industry dummies_____ |
yes |
yes |
yes | |||
Region dummies_____ |
yes |
yes |
yes | |||
Wald test for equality o: |
coefficients ' |
between Innovative and non Innovative_________________ | ||||
Capital-lab or ratio |
[0.000] |
[0.000] |
[0.000] | |||
Age______________ |
[0.0085] |
[0.138] |
[0.0003] | |||
Share of temporary |
[0.069] |
[0.011] |
[0.0946] | |||
Chow test F__________ |
[0.000] |
[0.000] |
[0.000] | |||
Adj R2_______________ |
0.154 |
0.157 |
0.171 | |||
N____________ |
7977 |
7977 |
7977 |
Note: * 10%, ** 5%, *** 1% level of significance, p-values in brackets. Size, areas, industry and group dummies
are included in all regressions.
Table 4 shows the OLS coefficients and robust standard errors of the estimates of labor productivity
growth rates (two-year rates) on our variables of interest, interacted with the group dummies.
“Innov” refers to the group of firms introducing an innovation in 2001-2003, while “non_Innov”
refers to the group of the non innovative firms. Column 1 and 2 refer to firms which have
introduced any - hence either product or process - innovation. Column 3 and 4 refer to firms which
have introduced product innovation only and column 5 and 6 refer to firms having introduced
process innovation only. All the regressions include standard control variables such as size,
geographical areas, industry dummies, as well as the dummy that takes a value of one for firms
17
More intriguing information
1. The Role of State Trading Enterprises and Their Impact on Agricultural Development and Economic Growth in Developing Countries2. Business Networks and Performance: A Spatial Approach
3. ‘Goodwill is not enough’
4. GENE EXPRESSION AND ITS DISCONTENTS Developmental disorders as dysfunctions of epigenetic cognition
5. Macroeconomic Interdependence in a Two-Country DSGE Model under Diverging Interest-Rate Rules
6. The name is absent
7. Road pricing and (re)location decisions households
8. The name is absent
9. The Impact of EU Accession in Romania: An Analysis of Regional Development Policy Effects by a Multiregional I-O Model
10. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods