The name is absent



Table 6. The effect of tax progressivity on student achievement

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

Income tax rate progressivity

-0.141*

-0.009

-0.086*

-0.074+

-0.074

-0.133**

-0.025

0.018

(0.058)

(0.059)

(0.042)

(0.039)

(0.057)

(0.046)

(0.050)

(0.066)

GDP per capita (log)

-

1.297**

1.113*

1.031+

2.118+

0.001

1.399+

4.794**

(0.226)

(0.558)

(0.523)

(1.197)

(0.258)

(0.772)

(1.534)

Percentage secondary school

-

0.945**

-0.601

-0.51

1.013

1.403**

-0.067

0.637

attained among adults (log)

(0.336)

(0.496)

(0.449)

(1.043)

(0.285)

(0.671)

(1.258)

Population size (log)

-

0.109

0.654

-0.632

0.857

0.005

4.553

-1.245

(0.085)

(1.245)

(1.178)

(10.023)

(0.061)

(2.789)

(10.999)

trend

-

-

-

-0.006

(0.017)

-

-

-

-

Country fixed effects

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Time fixed effects

No

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

County specific trends

No

No

No

No

Yes

No

No

Yes

Observations

206

180

180

180

180

116

116

116

No of countries

64

56

56

56

56

28

28

28

Sample

All

All

All

All

All

OECD

OECD

OECD

R2

0.029

0.387

0.958

0.952

0.983

0.280

0.855

0.939

R2 (within)

-

-

0.188

0.066

0.674

-

0.290

0.700

Note. Absolute standard errors in parentheses, +, * and ** denote significance at 10, 5 and 1 percent level,
respectively.

Regarding OECD countries, there is a strong negative effect of tax progressivity (column (6))
when the model does not include country fixed effects, but the effect disappears when country
fixed effects are added. This finding is similar to the pattern observed for government
consumption spending in the OECD countries (columns (6) to (8) of Table 4). In Table 6, it
most possibly suggests that the conditional within country variation of tax progressivity is too
small to identify a statistically significant effect.

To sum up, we find that a more income redistributive state as measured by the progressivity of
the income tax system is negatively correlated with student performance in international tests
of Mathematics and Science. Again, this result holds for the world sample, and in tendency
for the OECD sample. It is in strong support of our hypothesis.

5.4. Generosity of the welfare system

The sizes of government consumption and welfare spending, expressed in percentage of GDP,
are commonly viewed as proxies for the generosity of redistributive activities by the
government. However, in principle, generosity of social transfers can be more directly
assessed when values per recipient of social benefits in place of per capita numbers are
employed. However, precise information on number of recipients is not easily available. Thus,

21



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. FISCAL CONSOLIDATION AND DECENTRALISATION: A TALE OF TWO TIERS
3. Cross-Country Evidence on the Link between the Level of Infrastructure and Capital Inflows
4. Agricultural Policy as a Social Engineering Tool
5. Evidence on the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Three European Regions
6. Konjunkturprognostiker unter Panik: Kommentar
7. A Location Game On Disjoint Circles
8. Creating a 2000 IES-LFS Database in Stata
9. Correlates of Alcoholic Blackout Experience
10. The name is absent