Concerns for Equity and the Optimal Co-Payments for Publicly Provided Health Care



Figure 2: Expected utility as a function of the severity of the illness


Δ = H⅜)>'(y t) У δ(u)dF(y, )

[1+ t'(p)]u'(У t P) 2" δ(υ)dF(y,€) (15)

Moreover, (13) can in this case be written as

ʃ δ(υ)dF(y,€) = ʃ δ(υ)dF(y,€) < 0

(16)


since δ(v)0 for € > L. The first integral in (15) is in other words negative.
The second integral in (15) is positive, since
δ(v~) > 0 for € > L. Since the
terms
[t'(p)] and [1 + t'(p)] are both positive, it follows that Δ 0 in the
present case. From our previous discussion we thus have the the following
proposition:

10



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Keystone sector methodology:network analysis comparative study
3. How Low Business Tax Rates Attract Multinational Headquarters: Municipality-Level Evidence from Germany
4. Running head: CHILDREN'S ATTRIBUTIONS OF BELIEFS
5. What Lessons for Economic Development Can We Draw from the Champagne Fairs?
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON VIRGINIA DAIRY FARMS
9. The Role of Land Retirement Programs for Management of Water Resources
10. AGRIBUSINESS EXECUTIVE EDUCATION AND KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE: NEW MECHANISMS OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT INVOLVING THE UNIVERSITY, PRIVATE FIRM STAKEHOLDERS AND PUBLIC SECTOR