Concerns for Equity and the Optimal Co-Payments for Publicly Provided Health Care



Figure 2: Expected utility as a function of the severity of the illness


Δ = H⅜)>'(y t) У δ(u)dF(y, )

[1+ t'(p)]u'(У t P) 2" δ(υ)dF(y,€) (15)

Moreover, (13) can in this case be written as

ʃ δ(υ)dF(y,€) = ʃ δ(υ)dF(y,€) < 0

(16)


since δ(v)0 for € > L. The first integral in (15) is in other words negative.
The second integral in (15) is positive, since
δ(v~) > 0 for € > L. Since the
terms
[t'(p)] and [1 + t'(p)] are both positive, it follows that Δ 0 in the
present case. From our previous discussion we thus have the the following
proposition:

10



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Urban Green Space Policies: Performance and Success Conditions in European Cities
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Evaluating the Impact of Health Programmes
6. DURABLE CONSUMPTION AS A STATUS GOOD: A STUDY OF NEOCLASSICAL CASES
7. Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding and its determinants in first 6 months of life: A prospective study
8. Mean Variance Optimization of Non-Linear Systems and Worst-case Analysis
9. Insecure Property Rights and Growth: The Roles of Appropriation Costs, Wealth Effects, and Heterogeneity
10. Tastes, castes, and culture: The influence of society on preferences
11. Une Gestion des ressources humaines à l'interface des organisations : vers une GRH territoriale ?
12. Connectionism, Analogicity and Mental Content
13. Wage mobility, Job mobility and Spatial mobility in the Portuguese economy
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. A Theoretical Growth Model for Ireland
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. On the origin of the cumulative semantic inhibition effect
20. Globalization, Divergence and Stagnation