Concerns for Equity and the Optimal Co-Payments for Publicly Provided Health Care



Figure 2: Expected utility as a function of the severity of the illness


Δ = H⅜)>'(y t) У δ(u)dF(y, )

[1+ t'(p)]u'(У t P) 2" δ(υ)dF(y,€) (15)

Moreover, (13) can in this case be written as

ʃ δ(υ)dF(y,€) = ʃ δ(υ)dF(y,€) < 0

(16)


since δ(v)0 for € > L. The first integral in (15) is in other words negative.
The second integral in (15) is positive, since
δ(v~) > 0 for € > L. Since the
terms
[t'(p)] and [1 + t'(p)] are both positive, it follows that Δ 0 in the
present case. From our previous discussion we thus have the the following
proposition:

10



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF RESEARCH ON WOMEN FARMERS IN AFRICA: LESSONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS; WITH AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Reversal of Fortune: Macroeconomic Policy, International Finance, and Banking in Japan
10. CAN CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS PREDICT FINANCIAL CRISES? EMPIRICAL STUDY ON EMERGING MARKETS