Climate Policy under Sustainable Discounted Utilitarianism



is the discounted utilitarian (DU) SWF. Multiplying by 1 - δ ensures that the util-
ity weights 1 - δ, (1 - δ)δ, (1 - δ)δ
2, . . . add up to one. Such a normalisation is
essential for the analysis of this paper, as it makes the utility of each generation
comparable to the welfare of the stream.

The DU SWF is well-defined for the set of consumption streams which eventually
become constant. Furthermore, on this set, it is characterized by

w(tc) = (1 - δ)U(ct) + δw(t+1c)                         (w.1)

w(tc) = U(ct)     if tc is egalitarian .                    (w.2)

Clearly, (1) implies (w.1) and (w.2). Conversely, for any 0c = (c0, . . . , cτ , . . . ) with
c
τ = cT for all τ ≥ T , it follows from (w.2) that

w(Tc) =U(cT) = (1 - δ)X δτ-TU(cτ).

τ=T

Repeated use of (w.1) for t = T - 1, T - 2, . . . , 1, 0, now yields (1) for t = 0.

The sustainable discounted utilitarian (SDU) SWF modifies DU by requiring that
an SDU SWF not be sensitive to the interests of the present generation if the present
is better off than the future:

W (tc) =


(1 - δ)U (ct) + δW (t+1c)     if U(ct)≤W(t+1c)

(W.1)

W(t+1c)                      if U(ct) > W(t+1c),

W (tc) = U(ct)     if tc is egalitarian .                                  (W.2)

Condition (W.1) means that future utilities are not discounted (the discount factor is
set to 1) if the present is better off than the future. In this case, present utility is given
zero weight. The utility weights are still of the form 1 - δ, (1 - δ)δ, (1 - δ)δ
2, . . .
if generations with zero utility weight are left out, implying that the utility weights
add up to one also for the SDU SWF. This means that the utility of each generation is
comparable to the welfare of the stream and makes the comparison between U (c
t) and
W (
t+1 c) meaningful and independent of the period length. In particular, the welfare
of an egalitarian stream is equal to the utility of the constant level of consumption,
as specified by condition (W.2).

For any 0c = (c0, . . . , cτ, . . . ) with cτ = cT for all τ ≥ T , it follows from (W.2)
that W(
Tc) = U(cT). Repeated use of (W.1) for t = T - 1, T - 2, . . . , 1, 0, now
allows us to recursively calculate W (
T -1 c), W (T-2c), and so on, ending up with
W (
0c). Hence, on our domain of eventually constant consumption streams, the SDU
SWF is uniquely determined.



More intriguing information

1. Death as a Fateful Moment? The Reflexive Individual and Scottish Funeral Practices
2. Proceedings from the ECFIN Workshop "The budgetary implications of structural reforms" - Brussels, 2 December 2005
3. FASTER TRAINING IN NONLINEAR ICA USING MISEP
4. On the job rotation problem
5. EMU's Decentralized System of Fiscal Policy
6. The name is absent
7. Confusion and Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Public Goods Games
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys
12. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?
13. Should informal sector be subsidised?
14. Optimal Private and Public Harvesting under Spatial and Temporal Interdependence
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. The storage and use of newborn babies’ blood spot cards: a public consultation
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent