Strategic Investment and Market Integration



simplicity, we assume that the total unit-cost is independent of the strategy, i.e. ci + c2 = c. The
incumbent’s payo
ff is given by:

{n

ɪɪ V (χt xt) — ck                 global

''n1                                                                                                    (S)

ɪɪ [v (x∕Γ>Xt) cιqt] + C2к nG local
t=1

where qt = max {x7fl, kt}. The potential competitor must incur a market-specific fixed cost A > 0
to enter market
t. Let E be the set of all markets that player e will enter. Player e’s revenue
is
υ (xf, xβ). The marginal capital cost is c > 0 and additive. The objective of player e is to
maximize its payo
ff given by eq. (8).

We shall call kt a market commitment, if this part of the total capacity in a multi-market firm
is assigned to market t and cannot pro
fitably be used for production of goods sold in other local
markets. A su
fficient condition for market commitments is that the marginal cost to increase local
capacity is larger than the marginal incentive to increase the output in a monopoly market at the
deterring level
x. We refer to this condition as (C). More precisely,

(C    C1 .f (x,0)

Condition C simply guarantees that it is not profitable for player m to redistribute capacity to
a monopoly market, if entry occurs in other markets. If condition C is satis
fied and condition D is
satis
fied with equality, it is sufficient for player m to install a local capacity equal to the deterrence
level k
t = X and a multi-market capacity к = nx, to deter entry.

Proposition 7 If conditions C, D and S are satisfied in the fourth version of the п-market game,
Γ, local capacities kt = X and global capacity k4n = nx is sufficient to deter entry.

Proof. Entry deterrence is possible in Γ, due to (D). Player m will choose a local strategy and
installs capacity k
n = nx and kt = x for t = 1,..,n. If player e enters all markets, symmetric
incentives imply that
.x"fl = x and D implies that the profit of player e is not positive. If player e
enters one market (w.l.o.g. market 1) and stays out of all other markets, the following inequality
must hold for the incumbent to deter entry

v             ∂     ∂V      

(x, ■' (x)) + ci — (X, 0) 0                         (10)

xι-                  у      xt-f        J

16



More intriguing information

1. Perceived Market Risks and Strategic Risk Management of Food Manufactures: Empirical Results from the German Brewing Industry
2. The name is absent
3. Biologically inspired distributed machine cognition: a new formal approach to hyperparallel computation
4. Monopolistic Pricing in the Banking Industry: a Dynamic Model
5. A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING SOCIAL WELFARE EFFECTS OF NEW AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY
6. Problems of operationalizing the concept of a cost-of-living index
7. The name is absent
8. Input-Output Analysis, Linear Programming and Modified Multipliers
9. The name is absent
10. Fertility in Developing Countries