Strategic Investment and Market Integration



simplicity, we assume that the total unit-cost is independent of the strategy, i.e. ci + c2 = c. The
incumbent’s payo
ff is given by:

{n

ɪɪ V (χt xt) — ck                 global

''n1                                                                                                    (S)

ɪɪ [v (x∕Γ>Xt) cιqt] + C2к nG local
t=1

where qt = max {x7fl, kt}. The potential competitor must incur a market-specific fixed cost A > 0
to enter market
t. Let E be the set of all markets that player e will enter. Player e’s revenue
is
υ (xf, xβ). The marginal capital cost is c > 0 and additive. The objective of player e is to
maximize its payo
ff given by eq. (8).

We shall call kt a market commitment, if this part of the total capacity in a multi-market firm
is assigned to market t and cannot pro
fitably be used for production of goods sold in other local
markets. A su
fficient condition for market commitments is that the marginal cost to increase local
capacity is larger than the marginal incentive to increase the output in a monopoly market at the
deterring level
x. We refer to this condition as (C). More precisely,

(C    C1 .f (x,0)

Condition C simply guarantees that it is not profitable for player m to redistribute capacity to
a monopoly market, if entry occurs in other markets. If condition C is satis
fied and condition D is
satis
fied with equality, it is sufficient for player m to install a local capacity equal to the deterrence
level k
t = X and a multi-market capacity к = nx, to deter entry.

Proposition 7 If conditions C, D and S are satisfied in the fourth version of the п-market game,
Γ, local capacities kt = X and global capacity k4n = nx is sufficient to deter entry.

Proof. Entry deterrence is possible in Γ, due to (D). Player m will choose a local strategy and
installs capacity k
n = nx and kt = x for t = 1,..,n. If player e enters all markets, symmetric
incentives imply that
.x"fl = x and D implies that the profit of player e is not positive. If player e
enters one market (w.l.o.g. market 1) and stays out of all other markets, the following inequality
must hold for the incumbent to deter entry

v             ∂     ∂V      

(x, ■' (x)) + ci — (X, 0) 0                         (10)

xι-                  у      xt-f        J

16



More intriguing information

1. Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys
2. Feeling Good about Giving: The Benefits (and Costs) of Self-Interested Charitable Behavior
3. Thresholds for Employment and Unemployment - a Spatial Analysis of German Regional Labour Markets 1992-2000
4. Migration and employment status during the turbulent nineties in Sweden
5. Licensing Schemes in Endogenous Entry
6. Ruptures in the probability scale. Calculation of ruptures’ values
7. Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent