An Estimated DSGE Model of the Indian Economy.



where At is a technology parameter and Yt, ht and Kt are all in per-capita (household) units.
Assume first that capital can adjust instantly without investment costs. Then equating the
marginal product of labour with the real wage and the marginal product of capital with its
the cost (given by the real interest rate plus the depreciation rate,
Rt + δ), we have:4

Fh,t = αY = Wt

Fκ,t  = (1 α ) -j½- = Rt + δ


(9)


Kt


(10)


Let investment in period t be It . Then capital accumulates according to

Kt+1 = (1 δ ) Kt + It

(11)


The RBC model is then completed with an output equilibrium equating supply and demand

Yt = Ct + It + Gt

(12)


where Gt is government spending on services assumed to be formed out of the economy’s
single good and by a financial market equilibrium. In this model, the only asset accumulated
by households as a whole is capital, so the latter equilibrium is simply
Bt = Kt . Substituting
into the household budget constraint (5) and using the first-order conditions (9) and (10),
and (11) we end up with the output equilibrium condition (12). In other words, equilibrium
in the two factor markets and the output market implies equilibrium in the remaining
financial market, which is simply a statement of Walras’ Law.

Now let us introduce investment costs. It is convenient for the later development of
the model to introduce capital producing firms that at time
t convert It of output into
(1
S(Xt))It of new capital sold at a real price Qt and at a cost (that was absent before) of
S(Xt). Here, Xt -j-ι and the function S(■ ) satisfies S0, S00 0 ; S(1 + g) = S0(1 + g) = 0
where
g is the balanced-path growth rate. Thus, investment costs are convex and disappear
along in the balanced growth steady state. They then maximize expected discounted profits

Et    Dt,t+k [Qt+k (1 S (It+k/It+k-1))It+k It+k]

k=0

where Dt,t+k β+k is the real stochastic discount rate and

Kt+1 = (1 δ)Kt + (1 S(Xt))It

(13)


(14)


This results in the first-order condition

Qt(1 S(Xt) XtS0(Xt)) + Et Dt,t+1 Qt+1S(Xt+1) 21 = 1

4Thus Yt = Wtht + (Rt+ δ), the zero-profit condition for the competitive firm.



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. Competition In or For the Field: Which is Better
4. Standards behaviours face to innovation of the entrepreneurships of Beira Interior
5. The magnitude and Cyclical Behavior of Financial Market Frictions
6. Spatial agglomeration and business groups: new evidence from Italian industrial districts
7. How does an infant acquire the ability of joint attention?: A Constructive Approach
8. The name is absent
9. The voluntary welfare associations in Germany: An overview
10. Placenta ingestion by rats enhances y- and n-opioid antinociception, but suppresses A-opioid antinociception
11. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector
12. PROPOSED IMMIGRATION POLICY REFORM & FARM LABOR MARKET OUTCOMES
13. Feeling Good about Giving: The Benefits (and Costs) of Self-Interested Charitable Behavior
14. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON VIRGINIA DAIRY FARMS
15. A Study of Prospective Ophthalmology Residents’ Career Perceptions
16. THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF THE MEXICAN MARKET FOR U.S. COTTON: IMPACT OF THE ELIMINATION OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING QUOTAS
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. On the estimation of hospital cost: the approach
20. The name is absent