146 http://www.demographic-research.org
|
CO CO < -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
§ g I original imputed histories ^O ci to ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
Sq∣ histories Simpleordifferentiateddegreeclassification without |
|
о £ -ʊ --------------------------------------------------------- information |
|
φ _co о simple simple differentiated differentiated on date z5 о ô ____________________________________________________________________ u ∙ u |
|
о §- ʃʌ first date or last date highest degree at interview was highest |
|
≡ я f∣ attained degree at |
|
< Eo о ----------------------------------------------------Interviewwas |
|
I £ first last first last attained Crt -ʊ |
|
§? g age (absolute risks) 3 crι |
|
I p 15-19 0.0036 0.0037 0.0040 0.0038 0.0040 0.0038 |
|
f 20-24 0.0061 0.0059 0.0066 0.0060 0.0066 0.0053 |
|
° 25-29 0.0125 0.0120 0.0130 0.0123 0.0130 0.0115 |
|
30-34 0.0099 0.0097 0.0100 0.0099 0.0100 0.0095 |
|
education (relative risks) |
|
no degree 0.55 0.65 0.59 0.63 0.59 0.67 |
|
school degrees |
|
lower sec. degree 1.52 * 1.98 *** 1.80 *** 1.92 “* 1.81 “* 2.02 *** |
|
adv. lower sec. degree 1.53 1.67 1.51 1.62 1.52 1.69 |
|
upper sec. degree 0.63 0.73 0.67 0.71 0.68 0.84 |
|
post-sec. degrees |
|
vocational degree 111111 |
|
univ.∕coll degree 0.68 ** 0.65 ** 0.65 ** 0.64 “ 0.64 “ 0.63 *** |
|
enrolled in education |
|
in school 0.09 *** 0.08 *** 0.07 *** 0.08 *** 0.07 *** 0.06 *** |
|
Invocationaltraining 0.20*** 0.18*** 0.21 *** 0.18*** 0.21 *** 0.19*** |
|
in university 0.14 *** 0.17 *** 0.20 *** 0.22 *** 0.20 *** 0.12 *** |
|
missing 0.58 0.17 * 0.15 * 0.16 * 0.15 * 0.17 * |
Table 2: Effect of education on risk of first birth. Results using original
education histories compared to results using education histories
imputed by different methods
More intriguing information
1. National curriculum assessment: how to make it better2. Regional specialisation in a transition country - Hungary
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY
7. Changing spatial planning systems and the role of the regional government level; Comparing the Netherlands, Flanders and England
8. Experimental Evidence of Risk Aversion in Consumer Markets: The Case of Beef Tenderness
9. A MARKOVIAN APPROXIMATED SOLUTION TO A PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT PROBLEM
10. On Evolution of God-Seeking Mind