|
Table 3 Average GLO and its Progress | |||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 | ||
|
(__LO 1970/99 |
(__LO 2000/05 |
%change in GLO |
% Growth | ||
|
1 |
_______Benin_______ |
26 |
37 |
37% |
0.93% |
|
2 |
______Burundi______ |
17 |
23 |
31% |
-0.27% |
|
3 |
Central African ______Republic_____ |
22 |
33 |
43% |
-0.59% |
|
4 |
_______Chad_______ |
24 |
33 |
31% |
1.15% |
|
5 |
______Congo______ |
27 |
33 |
17% |
1.61% |
|
6 |
Cote d'Ivoire |
34 |
45 |
27% |
-1.06% |
|
7 |
______Ghana*______ |
39 |
53* |
32% |
-0.10% |
|
8 |
______Kenya______ |
36 |
45 |
23% |
1.02% |
|
9 |
Madagascar |
21 |
31 |
40% |
-1.67% |
|
10 |
______Malawi______ |
33 |
42 |
23% |
0.80% |
|
11 |
_______Mali_______ |
25 |
38 |
44% |
1.03% |
|
12 |
_______Niger_______ |
28 |
31 |
12% |
-1.74% |
|
13 |
______Nigeria*______ |
40 |
53* |
29% |
0.56% |
|
14 |
_____Rwanda_____ |
18 |
26 |
36% |
0.50% |
|
15 |
______Senegal______ |
37 |
47 |
24% |
0.19% |
|
16 |
Sierra Leone |
22 |
28 |
27% |
-0.30% |
|
17 |
______Tanzania_____ |
29 |
40 |
31% |
0.75% |
|
18 |
______Togo______ |
34 |
39 |
12% |
-0.22% |
|
19 |
_____Uganda_____ |
26 |
37 |
38% |
0.69% |
|
20 |
_____Zambia*_____ |
39 |
50* |
25% |
-1.22% |
|
21 |
Zimbabwe |
30 |
40 |
31% |
-1.35% |
Notes: GLO for 0% TFP growth is 47.88. In only 3 countries with asterisk GLO reached this threshold.
12
More intriguing information
1. An Estimated DSGE Model of the Indian Economy.2. WP 48 - Population ageing in the Netherlands: Demographic and financial arguments for a balanced approach
3. The name is absent
4. Ruptures in the probability scale. Calculation of ruptures’ values
5. The Effects of Reforming the Chinese Dual-Track Price System
6. AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES
7. GROWTH, UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE WAGE SETTING PROCESS.
8. Road pricing and (re)location decisions households
9. The name is absent
10. Regional differentiation in the Russian federation: A cluster-based typification