Table 3: Robustness
|
Tax components |
Model A |
Model B |
Model C |
Model D |
Model E |
Model F |
Model G |
Model H |
Model I |
|
Parent country corporate tax rate: ⅞,*-ι |
045 |
CÔ8Ï7 |
LÏ7Ô |
Гпз |
СЫ46 |
CË5Ï7 |
ЙЁ262 |
CË7Ô2 |
СШ6 |
|
(1.80) |
(0.87) |
(2.21) |
(2.41) |
(0.80) |
(1.15) |
(-0.36) |
(1.49) |
(1.71) | |
|
Host country corporate tax rate: ij,t-ι |
-1.498 |
-2.161 |
-1.716 |
-1.302 |
-0.892 |
-1.136 |
-1.402 |
-1.670 |
-1.626 |
|
(-2.57) |
(-1.91) |
(-2.57) |
(-2.21) |
(-1.27) |
(-2.10) |
(-1.66) |
(-2.76) |
(-2.74) | |
|
Withholding tax rate on repatriated profits: tj,t-1 |
-1.545 |
-2.439 |
-2.415 |
-1.359 |
-1.354 |
-1.606 |
-1.554 |
-1.591 |
-1.453 |
|
(-3.06) |
(-1.80) |
(-3.33) |
(-2.79) |
(-2.32) |
(-3.24) |
(-2.14) |
(-3.22) |
(2.93) | |
|
Parent country depreciation allowances: <5⅛,t-1 |
-4.530 |
-4.869 |
-4.452 |
-4.294 |
-3.360 |
-5.106 |
-4.296 |
-3.617 |
-3.848 |
|
(-4.74) |
(-2.28) |
(-3.77) |
(-4.45) |
(-2.93) |
(-4.91) |
(-2.04) |
(-3.68) |
(-3.99) | |
|
Host country depreciation allowances: |
0.201 |
-1.176 |
0.067 |
-0.229 |
0.562 |
-0.721 |
-1.620 |
-0.355 |
-0.324 |
|
(0.29) |
(-1.19) |
(0.10) |
(-0.34) |
(0.72) |
(-0.98) |
(-1.22) |
(-0.52) |
(-0.46) | |
|
i≈-,t-ι × ΔS7⅛,t-ι × I(ΔS7⅛.t-ι > 0) |
-0.001 |
0.164 |
1.077 |
0.079 |
0.063 |
0.034 |
0.044 |
-0.019 |
0.004 |
|
(-0.02) |
(2.48) |
(0.84) |
(2.22) |
(0.85) |
(0.85) |
(0.96) |
(-0.47) |
(0.09) | |
|
<5i,t-ι × ΔSΛy ,-ι × I(ΔSΛy ,~ι > 0) |
0.005 |
-0.073 |
0.698 |
0.018 |
-0.113 |
-0.063 |
-0.188 |
-0.109 |
-0.082 |
|
(0.09) |
(-0.56) |
(0.53) |
(0.54) |
(-0.98) |
(-0.79) |
(-1.42) |
(-1.41) |
(-1.07) | |
|
⅞,t-ι × ΔS7⅛.t-ι × I(ΔS7⅛.t-ι > 0) |
0.006 |
-0.007 |
-0.465 |
-0.093 |
-0.375 |
-0.000 |
-0.110 |
0.069 |
0.050 |
|
(°-15) |
(-0.06) |
(-0.59) |
(-2.33) |
(-1∙52) |
(-θ-θɪ) |
(-1∙49) |
_ (1∙9°) |
_ (1∙36) _ |
Notes : H AC-corrected t-values in parentheses (Newey and West, 1987).
Model A (2195 observations): Secondary school enrollment instead of tertiary school enrollment.
Model B (1011 observations): Skill measure as proposed by Markusen (2002: p. 228) rather than tertiary school enrollment.
Model C (1410 observations): Capital stock per worker instead of tertiary school enrollment.
Model D (2195 observations): Gravity model instead of Knowledge Capital model.
Model E (1792 observations): Dynamic model as proposed by Arellano and Bond (1991) for panel data; Lagged dependent variable amounts to 0.221 (s.e. = 0.110).
Model F (2011 observations): Excluding transition economies (Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland).
Model G (846 observations): Excluding transition economies and non-EU members. 12 remaining EU economies.
Model H: р-value of F-test on joint significance of all third-country effects: 0.000; р-value of F-test on joint significance of all third-country effects of profit taxation: 0.006.
Model I: p-value of F-test on joint significance of all third-country effects: 0.000; p-value of F-test on joint significance of all third-country effects of profit taxation: 0.008.
All sensitivity checks should be compared to the full sample results in Table 2.
More intriguing information
1. Optimal Vehicle Size, Haulage Length, and the Structure of Transport Costs2. Investment in Next Generation Networks and the Role of Regulation: A Real Option Approach
3. EMU: some unanswered questions
4. Personal Income Tax Elasticity in Turkey: 1975-2005
5. The name is absent
6. The Variable-Rate Decision for Multiple Inputs with Multiple Management Zones
7. The name is absent
8. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development
9. The name is absent
10. The Effects of Attendance on Academic Performance: Panel Data Evidence for Introductory Microeconomics