Corporate Taxation and Multinational Activity



Table 3: Robustness

Tax components

Model A

Model B

Model C

Model D

Model E

Model F

Model G

Model H

Model I

Parent country corporate tax rate: ⅞,*-ι

045

CÔ8Ï7

LÏ7Ô

Гпз

СЫ46

CË5Ï7

ЙЁ262

CË7Ô2

СШ6

(1.80)

(0.87)

(2.21)

(2.41)

(0.80)

(1.15)

(-0.36)

(1.49)

(1.71)

Host country corporate tax rate: ij,t-ι

-1.498

-2.161

-1.716

-1.302

-0.892

-1.136

-1.402

-1.670

-1.626

(-2.57)

(-1.91)

(-2.57)

(-2.21)

(-1.27)

(-2.10)

(-1.66)

(-2.76)

(-2.74)

Withholding tax rate on repatriated profits: tj,t-1

-1.545

-2.439

-2.415

-1.359

-1.354

-1.606

-1.554

-1.591

-1.453

(-3.06)

(-1.80)

(-3.33)

(-2.79)

(-2.32)

(-3.24)

(-2.14)

(-3.22)

(2.93)

Parent country depreciation allowances: <5⅛,t-1

-4.530

-4.869

-4.452

-4.294

-3.360

-5.106

-4.296

-3.617

-3.848

(-4.74)

(-2.28)

(-3.77)

(-4.45)

(-2.93)

(-4.91)

(-2.04)

(-3.68)

(-3.99)

Host country depreciation allowances:

0.201

-1.176

0.067

-0.229

0.562

-0.721

-1.620

-0.355

-0.324

(0.29)

(-1.19)

(0.10)

(-0.34)

(0.72)

(-0.98)

(-1.22)

(-0.52)

(-0.46)

i≈-,t-ι × ΔS7⅛,t-ι × I(ΔS7⅛.t-ι > 0)

-0.001

0.164

1.077

0.079

0.063

0.034

0.044

-0.019

0.004

(-0.02)

(2.48)

(0.84)

(2.22)

(0.85)

(0.85)

(0.96)

(-0.47)

(0.09)

<5i,t-ι × ΔSΛy ,-ι × I(ΔSΛy ,~ι > 0)

0.005

-0.073

0.698

0.018

-0.113

-0.063

-0.188

-0.109

-0.082

(0.09)

(-0.56)

(0.53)

(0.54)

(-0.98)

(-0.79)

(-1.42)

(-1.41)

(-1.07)

⅞,t-ι × ΔS7⅛.t-ι × I(ΔS7⅛.t-ι > 0)

0.006

-0.007

-0.465

-0.093

-0.375

-0.000

-0.110

0.069

0.050

(°-15)

(-0.06)

(-0.59)

(-2.33)

(-152)

(-θ-θɪ)

(-149)

_ (19°)

_ (136) _

Notes : H AC-corrected t-values in parentheses (Newey and West, 1987).

Model A (2195 observations): Secondary school enrollment instead of tertiary school enrollment.

Model B (1011 observations): Skill measure as proposed by Markusen (2002: p. 228) rather than tertiary school enrollment.

Model C (1410 observations): Capital stock per worker instead of tertiary school enrollment.

Model D (2195 observations): Gravity model instead of Knowledge Capital model.

Model E (1792 observations): Dynamic model as proposed by Arellano and Bond (1991) for panel data; Lagged dependent variable amounts to 0.221 (s.e. = 0.110).

Model F (2011 observations): Excluding transition economies (Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland).

Model G (846 observations): Excluding transition economies and non-EU members. 12 remaining EU economies.

Model H: р-value of F-test on joint significance of all third-country effects: 0.000; р-value of F-test on joint significance of all third-country effects of profit taxation: 0.006.

Model I: p-value of F-test on joint significance of all third-country effects: 0.000; p-value of F-test on joint significance of all third-country effects of profit taxation: 0.008.

All sensitivity checks should be compared to the full sample results in Table 2.



More intriguing information

1. What Drives the Productive Efficiency of a Firm?: The Importance of Industry, Location, R&D, and Size
2. PROTECTING CONTRACT GROWERS OF BROILER CHICKEN INDUSTRY
3. Spatial patterns in intermunicipal Danish commuting
4. Langfristige Wachstumsaussichten der ukrainischen Wirtschaft : Potenziale und Barrieren
5. Road pricing and (re)location decisions households
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. APPLICATIONS OF DUALITY THEORY TO AGRICULTURE
9. Technological progress, organizational change and the size of the Human Resources Department
10. Mergers and the changing landscape of commercial banking (Part II)
11. The name is absent
12. Second Order Filter Distribution Approximations for Financial Time Series with Extreme Outlier
13. The name is absent
14. Financial Markets and International Risk Sharing
15. Human Rights Violations by the Executive: Complicity of the Judiciary in Cameroon?
16. The name is absent
17. Altruism with Social Roots: An Emerging Literature
18. ¿Por qué se privatizan servicios en los municipios (pequeños)? Evidencia empírica sobre residuos sólidos y agua.
19. A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile
20. The name is absent