Table 3: Robustness
|
Tax components |
Model A |
Model B |
Model C |
Model D |
Model E |
Model F |
Model G |
Model H |
Model I |
|
Parent country corporate tax rate: ⅞,*-ι |
045 |
CÔ8Ï7 |
LÏ7Ô |
Гпз |
СЫ46 |
CË5Ï7 |
ЙЁ262 |
CË7Ô2 |
СШ6 |
|
(1.80) |
(0.87) |
(2.21) |
(2.41) |
(0.80) |
(1.15) |
(-0.36) |
(1.49) |
(1.71) | |
|
Host country corporate tax rate: ij,t-ι |
-1.498 |
-2.161 |
-1.716 |
-1.302 |
-0.892 |
-1.136 |
-1.402 |
-1.670 |
-1.626 |
|
(-2.57) |
(-1.91) |
(-2.57) |
(-2.21) |
(-1.27) |
(-2.10) |
(-1.66) |
(-2.76) |
(-2.74) | |
|
Withholding tax rate on repatriated profits: tj,t-1 |
-1.545 |
-2.439 |
-2.415 |
-1.359 |
-1.354 |
-1.606 |
-1.554 |
-1.591 |
-1.453 |
|
(-3.06) |
(-1.80) |
(-3.33) |
(-2.79) |
(-2.32) |
(-3.24) |
(-2.14) |
(-3.22) |
(2.93) | |
|
Parent country depreciation allowances: <5⅛,t-1 |
-4.530 |
-4.869 |
-4.452 |
-4.294 |
-3.360 |
-5.106 |
-4.296 |
-3.617 |
-3.848 |
|
(-4.74) |
(-2.28) |
(-3.77) |
(-4.45) |
(-2.93) |
(-4.91) |
(-2.04) |
(-3.68) |
(-3.99) | |
|
Host country depreciation allowances: |
0.201 |
-1.176 |
0.067 |
-0.229 |
0.562 |
-0.721 |
-1.620 |
-0.355 |
-0.324 |
|
(0.29) |
(-1.19) |
(0.10) |
(-0.34) |
(0.72) |
(-0.98) |
(-1.22) |
(-0.52) |
(-0.46) | |
|
i≈-,t-ι × ΔS7⅛,t-ι × I(ΔS7⅛.t-ι > 0) |
-0.001 |
0.164 |
1.077 |
0.079 |
0.063 |
0.034 |
0.044 |
-0.019 |
0.004 |
|
(-0.02) |
(2.48) |
(0.84) |
(2.22) |
(0.85) |
(0.85) |
(0.96) |
(-0.47) |
(0.09) | |
|
<5i,t-ι × ΔSΛy ,-ι × I(ΔSΛy ,~ι > 0) |
0.005 |
-0.073 |
0.698 |
0.018 |
-0.113 |
-0.063 |
-0.188 |
-0.109 |
-0.082 |
|
(0.09) |
(-0.56) |
(0.53) |
(0.54) |
(-0.98) |
(-0.79) |
(-1.42) |
(-1.41) |
(-1.07) | |
|
⅞,t-ι × ΔS7⅛.t-ι × I(ΔS7⅛.t-ι > 0) |
0.006 |
-0.007 |
-0.465 |
-0.093 |
-0.375 |
-0.000 |
-0.110 |
0.069 |
0.050 |
|
(°-15) |
(-0.06) |
(-0.59) |
(-2.33) |
(-1∙52) |
(-θ-θɪ) |
(-1∙49) |
_ (1∙9°) |
_ (1∙36) _ |
Notes : H AC-corrected t-values in parentheses (Newey and West, 1987).
Model A (2195 observations): Secondary school enrollment instead of tertiary school enrollment.
Model B (1011 observations): Skill measure as proposed by Markusen (2002: p. 228) rather than tertiary school enrollment.
Model C (1410 observations): Capital stock per worker instead of tertiary school enrollment.
Model D (2195 observations): Gravity model instead of Knowledge Capital model.
Model E (1792 observations): Dynamic model as proposed by Arellano and Bond (1991) for panel data; Lagged dependent variable amounts to 0.221 (s.e. = 0.110).
Model F (2011 observations): Excluding transition economies (Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland).
Model G (846 observations): Excluding transition economies and non-EU members. 12 remaining EU economies.
Model H: р-value of F-test on joint significance of all third-country effects: 0.000; р-value of F-test on joint significance of all third-country effects of profit taxation: 0.006.
Model I: p-value of F-test on joint significance of all third-country effects: 0.000; p-value of F-test on joint significance of all third-country effects of profit taxation: 0.008.
All sensitivity checks should be compared to the full sample results in Table 2.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Forecasting Financial Crises and Contagion in Asia using Dynamic Factor Analysis
4. THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURE
5. New issues in Indian macro policy.
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. LOCAL PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES TO HELP FARM PEOPLE ADJUST
9. Chebyshev polynomial approximation to approximate partial differential equations
10. Tax systems and tax reforms in Europe: Rationale and open issue for more radical reforms