Table A3: Correlation between interactions using different skill measures
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (T) (S) (9) (10) (11)
ti,t-ι :: ΔSKij,^1 1- I(ASKijt~j > 0)
3i,f-1 τ ΔS⅛-ι τ I(ΔSK,j^1 > 0)
¾,(-ι T ΔSI⅛m T I(ΔSKi.i.f-1 > 0)
ASKiit ". AGDPijt: INTl
ASKiit :: SGDPijt: INT2
-ASKijt :: AGDPijt: INT3
(ASKijt)1:: Iog(DISTij): INT4
Secondary school enrollment
ti,t-1 × ΔS¼t~1 × I(ΔS¼t~1 > 0)
δi,t-1 × ΔS¼t~1 × I(ΔS^,f-1 > 0)
ʤ,t-i × ASKij,t-1 × I(ASKijtt-1 > 0)
ASKijt × AGDPijt: INTl
ASKijt × TGDPijt: INT2
θ0 -ASKijt × AGDPijt: INT3
∞ (ASKijt)2X log(D ISTij'): INT4
Capital stocks per worker
ti,t-ι × ASKijtt-ι × I(ΔS,A⅛jjt-ι > 0)
<5⅛,t-ι × ASKijtt-ι × I(ASKijtt-ι > 0)
ʤ,t-i × ASKijtt-1 × KASKijtt-1 > 0)
ASKijt × AGDPijt: INTl
ASKijt × TGDPijt: INT2
-ASKijt × AGDPijt: INT3
(ASKijt)1:: Iog(DISTij): INT4
Skill measure as proposed
by Markusen (2002)
ti,t-ι × ASKijtt-ι × I(ASKijtt-ι > 0)
<5⅛,t-ι × ASKijtt-ι × I(ASKijtt-ι > 0)
ʤ,t-i × ASKijtt-1 × I(ASKijtt-1 > 0)
ASKijt × AGDPijt: INTl
ASKijt × TGDPijt: INT2
-ASKijt × AGDPijt: INT3
(ASKijt)2X Iog(DISTij): INT4
Tertiary school enrollment
(1) 1
(2) 0.95 1
(3) 0.93 0.96 1
(4) -0.30 -0.35 -0.35 1
(5) 0.96 0.99 0.97 -0.36 1
(6) -0.06 -0.06 -0.06 0.02 -0.06 1
(7) 0.50 0.52 0.51 -0.26 0.53 0.66 1
(8) 0.16 0.12 0.11 0.07 0.14 -0.05 0.04 1
(9) 0.13 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.12 -0.04 0.03 0.99 1
(10) 0.11 0.08 0.10 0.06 0.10 -0.04 0.03 0.98 0.99 1
(11) 0.04 0.07 0.05 0.18 0.07 0.00 -0.01 0.69 0.70 0.70 1
(12) 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.07 0.13 -0.04 0.04 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.72
(13) 0.00 0.01 0.02 -0.03 0.02 0.04 -0.02 -0.08 -0.07 -0.07 0.0C
(14) 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.07 -0.05 -0.07 0.60 0.61 0.61 0.5C
(15) 0.05 -0.04 -0.06 0.16 -0.05 0.00 -0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.0C
(16) -0.06 -0.08 -0.10 0.16 -0.11 0.00 -0.07 -0.01 0.00 0.00 -0.01
(17) -0.06 -0.07 0.04 0.08 -0.08 0.00 -0.04 -0.07 -0.06 0.01 -0.0E
(18) 0.12 0.07 0.08 0.17 0.07 -0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
(19) 0.10 0.06 0.05 0.09 0.05 -0.03 -0.03 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.01
(20) 0.18 0.14 0.13 0.01 0.14 -0.05 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.01 -0.04
(21) -0.02 -0.04 -0.05 0.09 -0.07 0.03 -0.01 -0.05 -0.06 -0.04 -0.05
|
(22) |
0.05 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
-0.03 |
-0.09 |
0.11 |
0.12 |
0.11 |
0.1C |
|
(23) |
0.00 |
-0.01 |
-0.01 |
0.02 |
-0.01 |
-0.04 |
-0.12 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
o.os |
|
(24) |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.06 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
-0.05 |
-0.10 |
0.08 |
0.09 |
0.11 |
0.05 |
|
(25) |
-0.08 |
-0.07 |
-0.07 |
-0.05 |
-0.07 |
0.01 |
-0.02 |
-0.04 |
-0.03 |
-0.02 |
-0.04 |
|
(26) |
-0.06 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
-0.07 |
-0.02 |
-0.01 |
0.00 |
-0.07 |
-0.07 |
-0.06 |
-0.01 |
|
(27) |
-0.02 |
-0.01 |
-0.01 |
0.01 |
-0.02 |
0.00 |
-0.02 |
0.06 |
0.08 |
0.07 |
0.0S |
|
(28) |
-0.02 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
-0.05 |
0.02 |
-0.03 |
-0.01 |
-0.02 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.07 |
(12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) (28)
'. 1
) -0.07 1
) 0.62 0.64 1
) 0.01 -0.23 -0.17 1
. -0.01 -0.27 -0.20 0.76 1
; -0.05 -0.11 -0.09 0.60 0.62 1
0.01 0.06 0.07 0.17 0.09 0.08 1
0.04 -0.16 -0.09 0.38 0.36 0.24 0.11 1
I 0.01 -0.09 -0.07 0.07 0.02 -0.02 0.09 0.88 1
! -0.07 -0.11 -0.13 0.56 0.55 0.62 0.09 0.31 0.25 1
) 0.12 0.05 0.12 0.28 0.19 0.17 0.12 0.10 -0.03 0.06 1
I 0.11 0.08 0.13 0.16 0.20 0.15 0.09 0.06 -0.07 0.01 0.94 1
! 0.10 0.07 0.13 0.22 0.23 0.42 0.10 0.07 -0.08 0.16 0.90 0.92 1
I -0.03 0.01 -0.02 -0.04 -0.03 0.00 -0.40 -0.23 -0.23 -0.02 -0.09 -0.08 -0.07 1
. -0.06 0.10 0.02 -0.18 -0.17 -0.08 -0.25 -0.33 -0.28 -0.16 -0.10 -0.08 -0.06 0.68 1
I 0.08 -0.06 0.01 -0.02 0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.01 -0.06 -0.09 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01 -0.02 1
' 0.00 0.05 0.03 -0.24 -0.22 -0.12 -0.25 -0.28 -0.24 -0.28 -0.09 -0.08 -0.07 0.48 0.66 0.50 1
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Ex post analysis of the regional impacts of major infrastructure: the Channel Tunnel 10 years on.
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. For Whom is MAI? A theoretical Perspective on Multilateral Agreements on Investments
8. Computing optimal sampling designs for two-stage studies
9. How do investors' expectations drive asset prices?
10. The name is absent