Table 5: Regression results for minutes played
|
VARIABLES |
Minutes played | |||
|
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) | |
|
qualif ied |
0.061 |
0.057 |
0.042 |
0.041 |
|
(0.062) |
(0.088) |
(0.062) |
(0.086) | |
|
qualified * natteam |
-0.621*** |
-0.586*** | ||
|
(0.200) |
(0.201) | |||
|
qualified * natteam(1 — natteam) |
1.512** |
1.394** | ||
|
(0.646) |
(0.652) | |||
|
qualified * (age — age) |
-0.012 |
-0.010 | ||
|
(0.016) |
(0.016) | |||
|
f orward |
-0.510*** |
-0.513*** |
-0.511*** |
-0.515*** |
|
(0.129) |
(0.129) |
(0.129) |
(0.130) | |
|
midf ield |
-0.328*** |
-0.329*** |
-0.331*** |
-0.332*** |
|
(0.090) |
(0.089) |
(0.089) |
(0.089) | |
|
natteam |
0.176 |
0.165 | ||
|
(0.109) |
(0.107) | |||
|
natteam(1 — natteam) |
-0.116 |
-0.129 | ||
|
(0.353) |
(0.351) | |||
|
af ter * natteam |
0.620*** |
0.628*** | ||
|
(0.169) |
(0.172) | |||
|
af ter * natteam(1 — natteam) |
-1.074* |
-1.065* | ||
|
(0.588) |
(0.588) | |||
|
euro * natteam |
-0.251* |
-0.265* | ||
|
(0.145) |
(0.143) | |||
|
euro * natteam(1 — natteam) |
0.121 |
0.086 | ||
|
(0.376) |
(0.375) | |||
|
after * (age — age) |
-0.005 |
-0.007 | ||
|
(0.012) |
(0.012) | |||
|
Gameday dummies |
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
|
Club dummies |
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
|
Opponent dummies |
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
|
Player fixed effects |
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
|
Constant |
5.181*** |
5.142*** |
5.278*** |
5.231*** |
|
(0.583) |
(0.569) |
(0.569) |
(0.553) | |
|
Observations |
11821 |
11821 |
11821 |
11821 |
Notes: The table reports negative binomial regression estimates. Values between parentheses are robust standard er-
rors clustered at the player level. Only observations from players who are neither goalkeepers nor Austrian or Swiss
are included. Moreover, the sample includes only players who were active in both the 06/07 and the 07/08 season, and
before and after 21 Nov 2007, and with at least one strictly positive observation of minutes played in the two seasons.
*** p< 0.01, ** p< 0.05, * p < 0.1
31
More intriguing information
1. LOCAL CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICE2. Demand Potential for Goat Meat in Southern States: Empirical Evidence from a Multi-State Goat Meat Consumer Survey
3. The name is absent
4. The Cost of Food Safety Technologies in the Meat and Poultry Industries.
5. Effort and Performance in Public-Policy Contests
6. Subduing High Inflation in Romania. How to Better Monetary and Exchange Rate Mechanisms?
7. The name is absent
8. How Low Business Tax Rates Attract Multinational Headquarters: Municipality-Level Evidence from Germany
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent