Using the expression for σ2 in (4) and simplifying leads to
∂σ(hj ,hk ,hε) hε(2hj +hε)
∂hj 2h2(hj +hε)2
σ2 (hj ,hk ,hε) / hε [hj (hj +hε)+hk (hk +hε )] ) 2
∖ hj hk(hj +hε)(hk +hε) J
Taking limits yields
lim
hj →0
hε (2hj +hε)
2h2(hj +hε)2
h hε [hj (hj +hε)+hk(hk+hε)]
hjhk (hj +hε)(hk+hε)
1 /___hε____)2
2 ^hj (hj +hε)
lim —------
hj →0 / hε ) 2
∖hj (hj +hε) )
Iim 1 ( 1 nhει 1 ʌ ^ = ∞.
hj→0 2 hj (hj + hε)
42
More intriguing information
1. Computational Batik Motif Generation Innovation of Traditi onal Heritage by Fracta l Computation2. Importing Feminist Criticism
3. Surveying the welfare state: challenges, policy development and causes of resilience
4. The Integration Order of Vector Autoregressive Processes
5. Wounds and reinscriptions: schools, sexualities and performative subjects
6. The name is absent
7. Sector Switching: An Unexplored Dimension of Firm Dynamics in Developing Countries
8. Nach der Einführung von Arbeitslosengeld II: deutlich mehr Verlierer als Gewinner unter den Hilfeempfängern
9. Olive Tree Farming in Jaen: Situation With the New Cap and Comparison With the Province Income Per Capita.
10. Elicited bid functions in (a)symmetric first-price auctions