EU enlargement and environmental policy



disaggregated social accounting matrices for the associated countries. Detailed trade flows as
well as information about remaining trade barriers (e.g. estimation of the non-tariff trade
barriers) are necessary. The market structure in the economies in transition is far from perfect
competition, thus several market imperfections in production, in the labor market etc. and
short-time adjustments have to be considered. Important fiscal features of the EU, as the
structural funds and common agricultural policy are still not incorporated. The extension of
the model to capture other greenhouse gases especially N
2O and CH4, resulting from
agriculture, might be useful.

References

Armington P. S. (1969), A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of
Production,
IMF Staff Papers 16, 159-178

Baldwin R., Francois J. and Portes R. (1997), The cost and benefits of eastern enlargement:
the impact on the EU and central Europe,
Economic policy, 4/1997

Baumert K., Petkova E., and Barbu D. (1999), Capacity for Climate Economies in Transition
after Kyoto, The regional environmental center for Central and Eastern Europe
,
World Resources Institute

Bommer R. (1998), Economic integration and the environment, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
Publishing

Bohringer C., Rutherford T. F. (2000), Decomposing the Cost of Kyoto. A Global CGE
Analysis of Multilateral Policy Impacts, ZEW Discussion Paper 00-11, Mannheim

Bohringer C., Loschel A. (2002), The economic impacts of carbon abatement strategies, in: C.
Bohringer, M. Finus and C. Vogt (eds.),
Controlling Global Warning,
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing (forthcoming)

Breuss, F., Schebeck F. (1999), Costs and Benefits of EU’s Eastern Enlargement for Austria,
Austria Economic Quarterly, 4, 43-54

Cofala J., Jantzen J. de Haan B.J. (2000), Technical Report on Enlargement, RIVM

DOE (1998), Annual Energy Outlook, Energy Information Administration

EMF-16 Working Group (1999), Economic and Energy System Impacts of the Kyoto
Protocol: Results from the Energy Modeling Forum Study
, Stanford Energy
Modeling Forum, Stanford University

23



More intriguing information

1. How much do Educational Outcomes Matter in OECD Countries?
2. INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES
3. The name is absent
4. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development
5. THE DIGITAL DIVIDE: COMPUTER USE, BASIC SKILLS AND EMPLOYMENT
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Auction Design without Commitment
10. The Integration Order of Vector Autoregressive Processes
11. DETERMINANTS OF FOOD AWAY FROM HOME AMONG AFRICAN-AMERICANS
12. LOCAL CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICE
13. Testing Gribat´s Law Across Regions. Evidence from Spain.
14. The Variable-Rate Decision for Multiple Inputs with Multiple Management Zones
15. The name is absent
16. Willingness-to-Pay for Energy Conservation and Free-Ridership on Subsidization – Evidence from Germany
17. BARRIERS TO EFFICIENCY AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF TOWNSHIP-VILLAGE ENTERPRISES
18. The name is absent
19. Analyzing the Agricultural Trade Impacts of the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement
20. Literary criticism as such can perhaps be called the art of rereading.