Partner Selection Criteria in Strategic Alliances When to Ally with Weak Partners



early phase rapid adaptation to change is an essential competitive parameter. Firms with
strong resource endowments may be unable to quickly adapt to change (Henderson &
Clark, 1990) as they typically are large, which in general makes them less adaptable but
also because they may have developed certain routines that are not easily adjustable
(Nelson et al., 1982). Several authors argue that there is a negative correlation between
weak resource bases and post-entry survival rates (Geroski, 1995; Helfat et al., 2002).
However, this is not necessarily important as partners can function as “stepping-stones”
by facilitating early entry and then being replaced over the course of the industry life cy-
cle if desired. In sum, we argue that firms wishing to enter an emergent market should not
choose its ally primarily on the basis of its stock of resources but rather on the degree and
strength of aligned aspiration levels.

P1: In the exploratory stage the strength of aspiration levels is a more important crite-
rion for partner selection than the strength of resource endowments
4.2 Partner Selection Criteria in the Maturity Stage

Firms contemplating on market entry in the maturity stage face a different competitive
environment than the early movers. In the maturity stage technology and market uncer-
tainty have been resolved and few changes take place in the market.4 Established cus-
tomer connections stabilize the rate of change of market shares of the largest firms in the
industry (Agerwal et al., 2001; Klepper, 1996), while reduced uncertainty intensifies
competition between the firms in the market (Afuah et al., 1997). In this stage firms that
remain on the market will be determined to stay, and as growth rated decline and some
firms do better than others, some exits the market, not voluntarily but because they are
forced to. Whereas product innovations and improvements of functionalities are impor-
tant in the exploratory stage, in the maturity stage process innovations and cost reductions
for the end-customers are central (Adner & Levinthal, 2001; Klepper, 1996). The matur-
ity stage persists or is replaced by a decline phase where the demand decreases and may
fall to zero.

4 Naturally the maturity stage ends with uncertainty as a new exploratory growth stage in an emergent mar-
ket will replace it.

10



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. STIMULATING COOPERATION AMONG FARMERS IN A POST-SOCIALIST ECONOMY: LESSONS FROM A PUBLIC-PRIVATE MARKETING PARTNERSHIP IN POLAND
4. The name is absent
5. Strategic Effects and Incentives in Multi-issue Bargaining Games
6. The Triangular Relationship between the Commission, NRAs and National Courts Revisited
7. EU enlargement and environmental policy
8. Second Order Filter Distribution Approximations for Financial Time Series with Extreme Outlier
9. AN IMPROVED 2D OPTICAL FLOW SENSOR FOR MOTION SEGMENTATION
10. Should Local Public Employment Services be Merged with the Local Social Benefit Administrations?
11. The name is absent
12. The name is absent
13. Experience, Innovation and Productivity - Empirical Evidence from Italy's Slowdown
14. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. The name is absent
18. Regional specialisation in a transition country - Hungary
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent