Non Linear Contracting and Endogenous Buyer Power between Manufacturers and Retailers: Empirical Evidence on Food Retailing in France



The results show that the price coefficient has the correct sign. In the case of the random
coefficient logit model, the price coefficient has a distribution with mean equal to 20.33 and standard
deviation
σa equal to 6.42 which means that only 0.07% of the distribution of the coefficient ai
has the wrong sign. The mean taste of the mineral characteristic is positive which means that
consumers like mineral waters. Only 17.6% do not like it. In the multinomial or random coefficient
logit model, the parameter
τ of the control term 77jt (obtained from a first stage price regression
shown in appendix 7.3) is significantly positive showing that, on one hand, some correlation existed
between prices and unobserved product characteristics included in the error term
Sijt and these
unobserved characteristics would enter positively in the utility function. We would expect that
product advertising increases the consumer utility and is also positively correlated with price,
giving an interpretation to this control function approach as in Petrin and Train (2010).

Finally, once we obtained our structural demand estimates, we can compute price elasticities of
demand for these differentiated products. Table 3 presents the different average elasticities obtained
with the estimates of the random-coefficients logit model. Although the data are more recent and
the demand model more flexible and estimated on individual data, we obtain that mineral waters
are more sensitive to price variation than spring waters as in Bonnet and Dubois (2010).

Average Own-price Elasticities (Ejk)

Mean (Std. Dev.)

All                     -5.80 (1.68)

Mineral water       -6.70 (0.63)

Spring water        -3.09 (0.63)

Table 3 : Estimated Elasticities under Random Coefficients Logit

5.2 Estimation of Price-Cost Margins and Non Nested Tests

Once one has estimated the demand parameters, we can use the formulas obtained in section 3
to compute the price-cost margins at the retailer and manufacturer levels, for all products, under
the various classes of models considered. Under some models, wholesale, retail or total margins are
not identified without additional restrictions that we will thus impose. Empirically, we are able to
solve the minimization problem (23) using the additional restriction (22).

28



More intriguing information

1. The geography of collaborative knowledge production: entropy techniques and results for the European Union
2. Revisiting The Bell Curve Debate Regarding the Effects of Cognitive Ability on Wages
3. The name is absent
4. Putting Globalization and Concentration in the Agri-food Sector into Context
5. Real Exchange Rate Misalignment: Prelude to Crisis?
6. Cross-Country Evidence on the Link between the Level of Infrastructure and Capital Inflows
7. THE ANDEAN PRICE BAND SYSTEM: EFFECTS ON PRICES, PROTECTION AND PRODUCER WELFARE
8. Economies of Size for Conventional Tillage and No-till Wheat Production
9. The name is absent
10. On the job rotation problem
11. The Dynamic Cost of the Draft
12. The Employment Impact of Differences in Dmand and Production
13. The name is absent
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. Benchmarking Regional Innovation: A Comparison of Bavaria, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland
17. Structural Conservation Practices in U.S. Corn Production: Evidence on Environmental Stewardship by Program Participants and Non-Participants
18. Connectionism, Analogicity and Mental Content
19. DISCUSSION: ASSESSING STRUCTURAL CHANGE IN THE DEMAND FOR FOOD COMMODITIES
20. WP 92 - An overview of women's work and employment in Azerbaijan