Cointegration and polynomial cointegration are defined as follows
Definition 2.2. The I(d) process Xt is cointegrated if there exists β
such that β0Xt is I(b) with b < d. It is polynomially cointegrated if there
exists βk for k = 0, ∙ ∙ ∙ ,d — 1, such that Pd=0 β'k∆kXt is stationary.
3. Poles, order of integration and multiplicities
The characteristic polynomial of (2.1) is the p × p matrix function
k
Π(z) = Ip — X ΠiZ∖
i=1
and the characteristic equation is defined as ∣ Π(z) ∣ = 0, where ∣Π(z) ∣ =
det(Π(z)) is a polynomial of degree n ≤ kp, ∣Π(z) ∣ = ∑n=0 dizz. From
∣Π(0)∣ = 1 it follows that zero is not a root of the characteristic equa-
tion. Let nr be the number of distinct roots zi , each with multiplicity
mi ; the determinant can thus be written as
nr
(3.1) ∣Π(z)∣ = dn (z — zi)mi = (z — 1)mg(z),
i=1
where g(1) 6= 0 and 1 ≤ m ≤ n.
Assumption 3.1. The only unstable root is at z = 1; that is ∣Π(z)∣ = 0
implies zi = 1 or ∣zi ∣ > 1.
Evaluating the characteristic polynomial at the roots of the char-
acteristic equation we get reduced rank matrices; at the unit root we
write Π(1) = -αβ, where α and β are p × r matrices of full rank r < p.
The inverse is defined as the adjoint matrix Πa(z) = Adj(Π(z)) di-
vided by the determinant
(3.2) Π(z)-1 = ,z = {1,... ,znr}.
∣Π(z)∣
Since Π(z) has reduced rank at the roots of the characteristic equation,
(3.2) is not defined at z = {1, ∙ ∙ ∙ ,znr}. These singularities are known
to be poles but at the moment nothing can be said about their order.
Proposition 3.2. If Assumption 3.1 holds, then Xt is I(d) if and only
if Π(z)-1 has a pole of order d at z = 1.
Proof. By definition Xt is I(d) if ∆dXt = C(L)tt with C(z) =
i∞=0 Cizi convergent for ∣z∣ < 1 + δ for some δ > 0 and C(1) 6= 0; then
Π(z)-1 = C(z)/(1 — z)d has a pole of order d at z = 1. ■
More intriguing information
1. Washington Irving and the Knickerbocker Group2. Estimation of marginal abatement costs for undesirable outputs in India's power generation sector: An output distance function approach.
3. Declining Discount Rates: Evidence from the UK
4. An Efficient Circulant MIMO Equalizer for CDMA Downlink: Algorithm and VLSI Architecture
5. Developmental changes in the theta response system: a single sweep analysis
6. A Unified Model For Developmental Robotics
7. The growing importance of risk in financial regulation
8. Macroeconomic Interdependence in a Two-Country DSGE Model under Diverging Interest-Rate Rules
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent