Cointegration and polynomial cointegration are defined as follows
Definition 2.2. The I(d) process Xt is cointegrated if there exists β
such that β0Xt is I(b) with b < d. It is polynomially cointegrated if there
exists βk for k = 0, ∙ ∙ ∙ ,d — 1, such that Pd=0 β'k∆kXt is stationary.
3. Poles, order of integration and multiplicities
The characteristic polynomial of (2.1) is the p × p matrix function
k
Π(z) = Ip — X ΠiZ∖
i=1
and the characteristic equation is defined as ∣ Π(z) ∣ = 0, where ∣Π(z) ∣ =
det(Π(z)) is a polynomial of degree n ≤ kp, ∣Π(z) ∣ = ∑n=0 dizz. From
∣Π(0)∣ = 1 it follows that zero is not a root of the characteristic equa-
tion. Let nr be the number of distinct roots zi , each with multiplicity
mi ; the determinant can thus be written as
nr
(3.1) ∣Π(z)∣ = dn (z — zi)mi = (z — 1)mg(z),
i=1
where g(1) 6= 0 and 1 ≤ m ≤ n.
Assumption 3.1. The only unstable root is at z = 1; that is ∣Π(z)∣ = 0
implies zi = 1 or ∣zi ∣ > 1.
Evaluating the characteristic polynomial at the roots of the char-
acteristic equation we get reduced rank matrices; at the unit root we
write Π(1) = -αβ, where α and β are p × r matrices of full rank r < p.
The inverse is defined as the adjoint matrix Πa(z) = Adj(Π(z)) di-
vided by the determinant
(3.2) Π(z)-1 = ,z = {1,... ,znr}.
∣Π(z)∣
Since Π(z) has reduced rank at the roots of the characteristic equation,
(3.2) is not defined at z = {1, ∙ ∙ ∙ ,znr}. These singularities are known
to be poles but at the moment nothing can be said about their order.
Proposition 3.2. If Assumption 3.1 holds, then Xt is I(d) if and only
if Π(z)-1 has a pole of order d at z = 1.
Proof. By definition Xt is I(d) if ∆dXt = C(L)tt with C(z) =
i∞=0 Cizi convergent for ∣z∣ < 1 + δ for some δ > 0 and C(1) 6= 0; then
Π(z)-1 = C(z)/(1 — z)d has a pole of order d at z = 1. ■
More intriguing information
1. Demographic Features, Beliefs And Socio-Psychological Impact Of Acne Vulgaris Among Its Sufferers In Two Towns In Nigeria2. Herman Melville and the Problem of Evil
3. Does South Africa Have the Potential and Capacity to Grow at 7 Per Cent?: A Labour Market Perspective
4. Before and After the Hartz Reforms: The Performance of Active Labour Market Policy in Germany
5. Short Term Memory May Be the Depletion of the Readily Releasable Pool of Presynaptic Neurotransmitter Vesicles
6. Naïve Bayes vs. Decision Trees vs. Neural Networks in the Classification of Training Web Pages
7. CURRENT CHALLENGES FOR AGRICULTURAL POLICY
8. The name is absent
9. Outline of a new approach to the nature of mind
10. Real Exchange Rate Misalignment: Prelude to Crisis?