would attribute too much of the variation in fiscal policies to the economic cycle and too
little to the offsetting systematic discretionary adjustments.
To illustrate this phenomenon for Germany, France, Portugal and Spain, we follow Lane
(2003) in estimating the output elasticity of the main budgetary items. I.e., we regress in
(5.7) the main budget items on economic growth for the sample period 1970-2004,
dlogXi,t =ωi +γidlogYt +μi,t (5.7)
where Xi,t is total spending, government investment, current spending (consumption and
wage spending), or interest payments, and Yt is real output. Likewise, we estimate model
(5.7) in which where Xi,t contains either total revenues, current revenues or (in)direct tax
revenues. The estimates are also repeated for the decades 1970-1980, 1981-1990, and
1991 to 2004, as we have reasons to expect quite some time-variation. Table 5.7 reports
the results of an OLS estimation of (5.7), with a correction for first-order autocorrelation.
Table 5.7 Budget Elasticities from OLS on Equation 5.7
____________________France________________ |
________________Germany_____________ | |||||||
1970- 2004 |
1970- 1980 |
1980- 1990 |
1990- 2004 |
1970- 2004 |
1970- 1980 |
1980- 1990 |
1990- 2004 | |
Total spending |
0.32 |
-0.47 |
0.38 |
-0.09 |
1.04*** |
-0.06 |
1.28*** |
1.22*** |
Investment |
1.46 |
-4.09 |
6.52* |
6.13* |
3.55** |
-1.84 |
5.06* |
4.39* |
Current spending |
-0.15 |
-0.07 |
0.34 |
-0.55* |
0.73*** |
-0.21 |
1.00** |
0.88*** |
Consumption spending |
0.19 |
-0.26 |
0.63 |
-0.53* |
0.98*** |
-0.24 |
0.53 |
1.30*** |
Wage spending |
-0.16 |
-0.45 |
0.50 |
-0.08 |
1.04*** |
0.03 |
0.40** |
1.37*** |
Interest payments |
-3.94*** |
-8.12*** |
-5.20** |
-0.41 |
0.68** |
0.26 |
-0.49 |
0.92** |
Total revenues |
1.73*** |
1.18 |
0.56 |
1.48** |
1.47*** |
2.94*** |
1.52*** |
1.24*** |
Current revenues |
1.86*** |
1.16 |
0.81 |
1.97** |
1.46*** |
3.31*** |
1.48*** |
1.19*** |
Total tax revenues |
1.18*** |
0.83 |
-0.08 |
1.47** |
1.15*** |
1.87*** |
1.40*** |
1.09*** |
Direct tax revenues |
2.07*** |
1.61 |
-0.14 |
3.12** |
1.30*** |
2.50** |
1.17*** |
1.28*** |
Indirect tax revenues |
0.61** |
0.81 |
0.02 |
0.54 |
0.94*** |
1.08*** |
1.57*** |
0.87*** |
_____________________Portugal________________ |
____________________Spain________________ | |||||||
1970- |
1970- |
1980- |
1990- |
1970- |
1970- |
1980- |
1990- | |
2004 |
1980 |
1990 |
2004 |
2004 |
1980 |
1990 |
2004 | |
Total spending |
0.67** |
-0.37 |
1.23** |
1.46**’ |
0.03 |
-0.15 |
-0.45 |
0.33 |
Investment |
0.76 |
-1.39 |
5.35*** |
2.67 |
-0.37 |
2.60 |
-4.09 |
2.83 |
Current spending |
0.76*** |
-0.16 |
0.96** |
1.14** |
0.22 |
-0.27 |
0.22 |
-0.07 |
Consumption spending |
0.77*** |
0.10 |
1.40*** |
1.39** |
0.22 |
-0.10 |
0.29 |
0.26 |
Wage spending |
0.60** |
-0.39 |
1.53*** |
1.54** |
0.63 |
0.00 |
0.83* |
0.33 |
Interest payments |
-1.39 |
-2.67 |
-2.35 |
0.48 |
-1.31 |
-0.17 |
-2.71 |
-4.56*** |
Total revenues |
1.58*** |
1.31 |
2.27** |
2.59** |
1.36*** |
0.71 |
1.36*** |
2.95*** |
Current revenues |
1.62*** |
1.30 |
2.30** |
2.90** |
1.42*** |
0.71 |
1.36*** |
3.05*** |
Total tax revenues |
1.24*** |
0.82 |
1.07 |
1.70** |
0.99** |
0.35 |
0.78 |
1.81*** |
Direct tax revenues |
1.36*** |
0.96* |
1.31 |
2.87** |
1.08* |
-0.26 |
2.35*** |
1.43*** |
Indirect tax revenues |
1.02*** |
0.65 |
0.74* |
1.04** |
0.91* |
0.99 |
-0.87 |
2.15*** |
Note: */**/*** denotes significance at the 10/5/1 % significance levels, respectively.
The switch from small negative spending elasticities in OECD (Girouard and André,
2005) to a strongly positive elasticity is very strong in Germany and Portugal, where it is
significant for all budget items. Government investment is the most procyclical budget
component. But the main category driving this result is - in absolute terms - government
consumption. In Germany, a large role is also played by wage spending in the last decade.
Fiscal spending expansions under positive economic growth are strongly concentrated in
increased wage spending in Portugal. In contrast, Spain, and in particular France, have
not been subject to a similar bias. No expenditure item - except for interest payments -
shows significant signs of procyclicality.
151
More intriguing information
1. On the origin of the cumulative semantic inhibition effect2. Standards behaviours face to innovation of the entrepreneurships of Beira Interior
3. Knowledge, Innovation and Agglomeration - regionalized multiple indicators and evidence from Brazil
4. Keynesian Dynamics and the Wage-Price Spiral:Estimating a Baseline Disequilibrium Approach
5. The Prohibition of the Proposed Springer-ProSiebenSat.1-Merger: How much Economics in German Merger Control?
6. The name is absent
7. On the job rotation problem
8. Declining Discount Rates: Evidence from the UK
9. Governance Control Mechanisms in Portuguese Agricultural Credit Cooperatives
10. Proceedings from the ECFIN Workshop "The budgetary implications of structural reforms" - Brussels, 2 December 2005