Proceedings from the ECFIN Workshop "The budgetary implications of structural reforms" - Brussels, 2 December 2005



3.2


Strength versus comprehensiveness of reforms

Both theoretical and empirical evidence suggests that policy interactions can be important
and that comprehensive reform packages tend to be more effective than “piece-meal” reforms in
improving labour market outcomes.
80 Figure 7 classifies OECD countries according to the breadth
and depth of their reforms, in what may be regarded as a rough decomposition of the overall
reform intensity indicator along the two dimensions.
81 The breadth of reforms in each country is
approximated here by the standard deviation of reform intensities across the seven areas
mentioned previously: the lower the standard deviation, the more uniform are reform intensities
and the broader is the reform process. Depth is defined as the magnitude of the reform effort in
the main areas targeted by the country, measured as the average reform intensity across the three
areas (among the seven covered in the aggregate reform intensity indicator) in which measured
reform intensity is highest.
82

Figure 7. Depth and breadth of labour market reforms

Ranking of countries according to the breadth of their labour market reforms1

Broad
reforms

High intensity
of prioritised
reforms

IRL


Narrow
reforms



Low intensity
of prioritised
reforms


FIN                                     ITA

NLD

DNK

BEL

AUS

EU-15

DEU                     EMU-12


AUT

PRT

CAN

SWE


KOR

SVK

CHE

ESP


UK


FRA

LUX

NZL

NOR

HUN


USA


GRC

POL

JPN

CZE


TUR

ISL

MEX


1. The breadth of reforms is measured as the normalised standard deviation of reform intensities across areas (the lower the standard deviation, the more uniform reform intensities are across areas).

2. The depth of labour market reforms is measured as the average reform intensity across the three areas in which the country's reform effort has been strongest.

Source: Brandt, Burniaux and Duval (2005).

80. For a theoretical framework stressing the importance of policy interactions, see Coe and Snower (1997). For empirical evidence, see for
instance Belot and Van Ours (2000) or Elmeskov
et al. (1998). As previously mentioned, complementarities may also exist as regards the
political economy of reform.

81.For example, behind the broadly similar value of the overall indicator for Austria and the United Kingdom lie in fact very different compositions
of reform, as Austria undertook moderate efforts spread over a wide range of areas while the United Kingdom carried out major reforms
concentrated on two areas (labour taxes and ALMPs).

82. Considering the two - rather than three - highest reform intensities would alter only marginally the ranking of countries.

182



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. TECHNOLOGY AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PATENTS AND FIRM LOCATION IN THE SPANISH MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS INDUSTRY.
3. Une Classe de Concepts
4. GROWTH, UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE WAGE SETTING PROCESS.
5. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY
6. TOWARDS THE ZERO ACCIDENT GOAL: ASSISTING THE FIRST OFFICER MONITOR AND CHALLENGE CAPTAIN ERRORS
7. Draft of paper published in:
8. The WTO and the Cartagena Protocol: International Policy Coordination or Conflict?
9. Wounds and reinscriptions: schools, sexualities and performative subjects
10. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers