Proceedings from the ECFIN Workshop "The budgetary implications of structural reforms" - Brussels, 2 December 2005



unemployed worker finds a new job with probability ptu while a currently employed worker
looses his job and becomes unemployed with probability
pte . Both employed and unemployed
workers can expect the same pension. The budget constraint of both types is given by

Atwj =(1+rt)Atw-j1 +wtw -Ctwj                                                      (9)

where the superscript w = {e, u} indicates the employment status of worker j. The FOC of worker
ej is given by

(1-λtw)((1-pte)Cte+j1+pteCtu+j1)+λtwΛt+1Ctr+j1=((1+rt)Ωtβ)σCtej              (10)

The FOC of unemployed worker uj is given by

(1-λtw)((1- ptu)Ctu+j1+ ptuCte+j1)+λtwΛt+1Ctr+j1= ((1+rt)Ωtβ)σCtuj             (11)

σ

Where Λt = εt1-σ is the marginal rate of substitution of consumption across work and retirement
and
Ωt is a factor that adjusts the rate of time preference for the fact that the worker can be in a
different state next period. It is given by

1

ω t = (1 - λw ) + λwεpσ                                           (12)

The worker determines the level of consumption in period t such that the ratio of the marginal
utility of consumption tomorrow vs. today is equal to the difference between the real interest rate
and the rate of time preference. The expected marginal utility of consumption in the next period is
a weighted average of consumption in the two possible states. Notice, because of risk neutrality
only the mean of consumption in the two states matters. A closed form decision rule for workers
consumption can be derived and is given by

Ctwj = πt [Atwj +Htwj +Stwj]                                                     (13)

where the marginal propensity to consume out of wealth is given by

t = 1 -(((1 + r )Ω t )σ-1 βσ )π.                                            (14)

πt+1

The term H w is the present discounted income of an employed or unemployed worker. Because
workers can switch employment status randomly in the next period,
H e and H u are best
represented by the following arbitrage conditions

(1 -λw)

He = -(----((1 - pe ) Hej1 + peHuj 1 )+ we                              (15)

t (1 + r )Ω t     t+1      t t+1       t

74



More intriguing information

1. Three Policies to Improve Productivity Growth in Canada
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Getting the practical teaching element right: A guide for literacy, numeracy and ESOL teacher educators
5. Modelling the health related benefits of environmental policies - a CGE analysis for the eu countries with gem-e3
6. Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys
7. Globalization, Redistribution, and the Composition of Public Education Expenditures
8. The name is absent
9. The Mathematical Components of Engineering
10. EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES
11. Non-farm businesses local economic integration level: the case of six Portuguese small and medium-sized Markettowns• - a sector approach
12. The mental map of Dutch entrepreneurs. Changes in the subjective rating of locations in the Netherlands, 1983-1993-2003
13. Disentangling the Sources of Pro-social Behavior in the Workplace: A Field Experiment
14. The name is absent
15. Regulation of the Electricity Industry in Bolivia: Its Impact on Access to the Poor, Prices and Quality
16. The Folklore of Sorting Algorithms
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. Herman Melville and the Problem of Evil
20. Determinants of Household Health Expenditure: Case of Urban Orissa