Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation



outcomes available in the CNLSY data. They solve several problems in estimating skill
formation technologies. First, there are many proxies for parental investments in children’s
cognitive and noncognitive development. Using a dynamic factor model, we let the data
pick the best combinations of family input measures that predict levels and growth in test
scores. Measured inputs that are not very informative on family investment decisions will
have negligible estimated factor loadings. Second, our models help us solve the problem of
missing data. Assuming that the data are missing at random, we integrate out the missing
items from the sample likelihood.

In practice, we cannot empirically distinguish investments in cognitive skills from invest-
ments in noncognitive skills. Accordingly, we assume investment in period t is the same for
both skills although it may have different effects on those skills. Thus we assume I
C,t = IN,t
and define it as It .

4.1 Empirical Specification

We use the separable measurement system (3.1). We estimate versions of the technology
(2.3)-(2.4) augmented to include shocks:

1

φs,k             φs,k             φs,k             φs,k             φs,k φs,k ηk t+1

θk,t+1 = γs,k,1θC,t + γs,k,2θN,t + γs,k,3It + γs,k,4θC,P + γs,k,5θN,P e ,   ,      (4.1)

where γs,k,l 0 and Pl5=1 γs,k,l = 1, k {C, N}, t {1, 2}, s {1, 2}. We assume that
the innovations are normally distributed:
ηk,t ~ N (θ, δ2,s). We further assume that the ηk,t
are serially independent over all t and are independent of n`,t for k = '. We assume that
measurements Z
a,k,t,j proxy the natural logarithms of the factors. In the text, we report only
anchored results.
30 For example, for a = 1,

Z1,k,t,j = μ1,k,t,j + α1,k,t,j ln θk,t + ε1,k,t,j

j{1,...,Ma,k,t},t{1,...,T},k{C,N}.

We use the factors (and not their logarithms) as arguments of the technology.31 This keeps
the latent factors non-negative, as is required for the definition of technology (4.1). Collect
the ε terms for period t into a vector ε
t. We assume that εt ~ N (θ, Λt), where Λt is a
diagonal matrix. We impose the condition that ε
t is independent from εt0 for t 6= t0 and all

30Web Appendix 11.1 compares anchored and unanchored results.

31We use five regressors (X) for every measurement equation: a constant, the age of the child at the
assessment date, the child’s gender, a dummy variable if the mother was less than 20 years-old at the time
of the first birth, and a cohort dummy (one if the child was born after 1987 and zero otherwise).

23



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Motivations, Values and Emotions: Three Sides of the same Coin
3. Correlation Analysis of Financial Contagion: What One Should Know Before Running a Test
4. Consumption Behaviour in Zambia: The Link to Poverty Alleviation?
5. INSTITUTIONS AND PRICE TRANSMISSION IN THE VIETNAMESE HOG MARKET
6. Should informal sector be subsidised?
7. The name is absent
8. Towards Teaching a Robot to Count Objects
9. The name is absent
10. LOCAL PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES TO HELP FARM PEOPLE ADJUST
11. Palvelujen vienti ja kansainvälistyminen
12. A Principal Components Approach to Cross-Section Dependence in Panels
13. The name is absent
14. The name is absent
15. Regional Intergration and Migration: An Economic Geography Model with Hetergenous Labour Force
16. Experience, Innovation and Productivity - Empirical Evidence from Italy's Slowdown
17. Distortions in a multi-level co-financing system: the case of the agri-environmental programme of Saxony-Anhalt
18. The use of formal education in Denmark 1980-1992
19. Commitment devices, opportunity windows, and institution building in Central Asia
20. The name is absent