Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 11



inexorably towards market failures - and particularly to idea underproduction in the absence of
policy intervention. To frame the analysis of science policy to follow, first consider two core
features of ideas, the market failures they cause, and the particular government institutions that
exist - and must be well designed - to combat them.

First, ideas are typically harder to create than to copy. More specifically, the production
of new ideas involves fixed costs to conceive, develop, demonstrate, and market the idea. If,
once this hard work is done, entrants can freely adopt the creation, then the resulting competition
will reduce profits from the new idea. This ex-post competition can kill the incentive to produce
the idea in the first place, especially to the extent that the innovator cannot recoup the fixed costs
of their investment. Intellectual property law, especially patents, serves to limit this ex-post
dissipation of profits, thus maintaining incentives for the technological advances that drive
economic growth. Patent-granting organizations, such as the USPTO, thus play essential roles in
creating well constructed property rights for new ideas.

Second, ideas are often cumulative, building one upon another. To the extent that the
creator of the initial idea cannot capture the returns to future creativity that the idea unleashes,
the incentive to create an idea may again be insufficiently strong. Patent law also plays a role
here: by forcing disclosure of the idea, other innovators are more able to build upon it. But this
market failure may be particularly acute for basic research, where new ideas may have little
commercial possibility directly but underpin hosts of downstream, commercial innovations.
Here, direct government support for basic research (through the university system, government
laboratories, and through institutions like the NIH and NSF) may thus also be critical to
sustaining idea production and, ultimately, economic growth. In effect, because basic research
may provide little direct commercial payoff, the enterprise of basic research - including the
researchers themselves - rely importantly on subsidies from public sources.

Given this reasoning, we can consider three key aspects of science policy that the
changing nature of science bears especially upon.

1. Entry. Scientific and technical progress ultimately relies on the entry of talented
individuals into scientific careers. To the extent that markets alone do not create

16



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns
3. An Attempt to 2
4. Volunteering and the Strategic Value of Ignorance
5. THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURE
6. The name is absent
7. Bird’s Eye View to Indonesian Mass Conflict Revisiting the Fact of Self-Organized Criticality
8. Luce Irigaray and divine matter
9. The name is absent
10. The bank lending channel of monetary policy: identification and estimation using Portuguese micro bank data
11. HEDONIC PRICES IN THE MALTING BARLEY MARKET
12. Income Mobility of Owners of Small Businesses when Boundaries between Occupations are Vague
13. Campanile Orchestra
14. A Computational Model of Children's Semantic Memory
15. The name is absent
16. An Efficient Secure Multimodal Biometric Fusion Using Palmprint and Face Image
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. References