Survey of Literature on Covered and Uncovered Interest Parities



- 14 -

Transactions costs induced hysteresis bands which are larger for shorter horizon
data [Baldwin, 1990]

Tests of UIP with survey data

Direct tests of UIP have been attempted from survey data on expectations, and the
results favor UIP, thus implying that rejection of unbiasedness in the data comes from
imposition of rational and linear expectations. [Froot and Frankel 1989, Chinn and
Frankel 1994, 2002; Chinn 2006]. The problems with survey data are that these might not
reflect true expectations, might have different working horizons than those of the
forecasters and more importantly might be based on the current forward premium
themselves. Another issue with survey data is its availability and completeness.

Unbiasedness over time

Flood and Rose (2002) and Baillie and Bollerslev (2000) provide evidence that
deviations from UIP were lower in the 1990’s than earlier. Flood and Rose (2002) use
daily data from both industrial and some emerging market economies and find that not
only are estimated coefficients positive in the 1990’s (compared to negative coefficients
found in studies with data for previous decades) but also that UIP holds better at times of
crises. Baillie and Bollerslev (2000) estimate betas from 5 year rolling regressions,
beginning March 1973 with monthly horizon data and find that in the 1990’s even
conventional estimates of betas turned positive [See Figure 4]. Chinn and Meredith



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Examining the Regional Aspect of Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries
5. Evaluating the Success of the School Commodity Food Program
6. The name is absent
7. Permanent and Transitory Policy Shocks in an Empirical Macro Model with Asymmetric Information
8. A Brief Introduction to the Guidance Theory of Representation
9. Measuring Semantic Similarity by Latent Relational Analysis
10. Tobacco and Alcohol: Complements or Substitutes? - A Statistical Guinea Pig Approach