The Economics of Uncovered Interest Parity Condition for Emerging Markets: A Survey



briefly, first by focusing on what we call as “traditional/text-book” reasons that undermines
the UIP condition. Thereafter, we present studies benefiting from recent methodological
advances that may shed light on the highly stylized forward premium bias.

(i) Rational expectations assumption does not hold, i.e. st+k = E[st+k|It] + ηt+k where
the forecast error
ηt+k depends on the information available at time t, which yields excess
returns even when agents are risk-neutral. In particular, under such non-rational expecta-
tions, we have the following UIP regression:

kst+k = β0 + β1 (ftk - st) + ηt+k + ut+k
where ut+k is a white-noise disturbance term. Both the experimental (see Marey, 2004a-b,
and references therein) and survey evidence (see MacDonald, 2000; and Pesaran and Weale,
2006; for a review of this literature) on the formation of market expectations of the exchange
rate reveals that market participants form their expectations in a non-rational way.

(4)


(ii) Risk neutrality assumption does not hold and risk-averse investors demand a pre-
mium for holding assets that are perceived to be risky. Accordingly, defining the risk
premium as
ρt = ftk - ste+k within the context of equation (3b), the risk-premium adjusted
UIP condition can be stated as

ek st+k = β0 + β1 ftk - st - ρt + ut+k
where ut+k is a white-noise error term. Since tests for the UIP condition involve a joint
hypothesis that comprises of rational expectations and risk-neutrality, one can use survey-
based expected depreciation data to isolate the effect of risk neutrality. In this vein, for
instance, MacDonald (2000), and Chinn and Frankel (2002) rely on survey-based data on
the bilateral US dollar exchange rate for different forecast horizons, and document that
the UIP slope coefficient is significantly different from one, justifying the presence of a
time-varying risk premium.

(5)


Next, we consider the literature on the “not-so-traditional” reasons for the observed
deviations from the UIP condition. As aforementioned, a more complete picture can be



More intriguing information

1. Ruptures in the probability scale. Calculation of ruptures’ values
2. AMINO ACIDS SEQUENCE ANALYSIS ON COLLAGEN
3. The name is absent
4. A Hybrid Neural Network and Virtual Reality System for Spatial Language Processing
5. The name is absent
6. Notes on an Endogenous Growth Model with two Capital Stocks II: The Stochastic Case
7. Publication of Foreign Exchange Statistics by the Central Bank of Chile
8. GROWTH, UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE WAGE SETTING PROCESS.
9. Dynamic Explanations of Industry Structure and Performance
10. EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES
11. The Challenge of Urban Regeneration in Deprived European Neighbourhoods - a Partnership Approach
12. Endogenous Heterogeneity in Strategic Models: Symmetry-breaking via Strategic Substitutes and Nonconcavities
13. The name is absent
14. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY: THE LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY AGENDA
15. Neighborhood Effects, Public Housing and Unemployment in France
16. The name is absent
17. The East Asian banking sector—overweight?
18. SOME ISSUES CONCERNING SPECIFICATION AND INTERPRETATION OF OUTDOOR RECREATION DEMAND MODELS
19. The name is absent
20. Whatever happened to competition in space agency procurement? The case of NASA