Merz: The Distribution of Income of Self-employed, Entrepreneurs and Professions
17
Table 4: Redistributional Effects of Taxation in Germany 1992: Employees
and Self-Employed (Entrepreneurs and Professionals*)
All Working |
Employees |
Entrepreneurs |
Professions* | |
Mean |
-22,0 |
-19,7 |
-32,6 |
-34,4 |
Gini |
-9,0 |
-7,1 |
-9,7 |
-9,9 |
Atkinson-Index | ||||
? = 1 |
-13,3 |
-11,1 |
-13,5 |
-14,1 |
? = 2 |
-3,0 |
-2,8 |
-3,3 |
-5,0 |
Quintile Shares (%) | ||||
1. Quintile |
20,5 |
16,2 |
43,6 |
44,1 |
2. Quintile |
11,7 |
8,2 |
34,7 |
27,3 |
3. Quintile |
6,8 |
3,7 |
26,4 |
18,9 |
4. Quintile |
4,2 |
1,4 |
19,2 |
9,4 |
5. Quintile |
-7,3 |
-5,3 |
-9,0 |
-10,1 |
90/10 ratio |
-30,3 |
-24,4 |
-39,9 |
-42,8 |
R(%) |
-8,4 |
-5,9 |
-13,6 |
-11,7 |
k (DM) |
-3.950 |
-2.486 |
-12.424 |
-15.557 |
Net income = individual taxable income minus fixed income tax (yearly)
All working = employees and self-employed (entrepreneurs and professions*);
not included: income predominant from capital assets, let and lease, other sources
Self-employed are divided in entrepreneurs (with profit income from agriculture and forestry and from
trading) and in professions* here as the independent (the number of independent
persons are by far dominated by the number of professions (Freie Berufe)
k = redistributional effect in DM
R = k/mean: redistributional effect as % of mean gross income (=2(Gini(nett)-Gini(gross))*100
Source: Income Tax Statistic 1992, Sample of Individual Incomes and Taxes,
Federal Statistical Office 1999, 1995; Own calculations
The above measures show different impacts with regard to different part of the income
distribution. An overall redistributional and easily to be interpretable measure is the k-
measure by Blackburn 1989. Blackburn considers a simple redistributive scheme: to
every income unit below the median level of income an equal-sized, lump-sum tax, is
applied while transferring the value of the lump-sum tax to every unit above the median
(or vice versa). The redistributional effect, the impact here of the taxation system then is
that value of the lump-sum as a percentage of the mean level of before tax income. As
Blackburn (1989) has shown the respective index partitioning is valid only for the Gini-
coefficient resulting in
(1) R = k/mean before tax = 2(Gini after tax - Gini before tax)
The redistributional impacts of the German tax system 1992 are: R% from mean taxable
income, or equivalent k DM, is the lump-sum necessary to make the net income
distribution - after imposing the tax system - equally distributed (same inequality index)
as 'gross' taxable income: for employees R= -5,9% (k = -2.486 DM), for entrepreneurs
R = -13,6 % (k = -12.424 DM) and for professions* R = -11,7%
(k = -15.557 DM) is the necessary amount every person above the median had to
transfer to the persons below the median to achieve the same distributional measure
before and after.
More intriguing information
1. Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles2. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY: THE LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY AGENDA
3. Kharaj and land proprietary right in the sixteenth century: An example of law and economics
4. Contribution of Economics to Design of Sustainable Cattle Breeding Programs in Eastern Africa: A Choice Experiment Approach
5. Dynamic Explanations of Industry Structure and Performance
6. Foreign Direct Investment and Unequal Regional Economic Growth in China
7. Correlation Analysis of Financial Contagion: What One Should Know Before Running a Test
8. The Shepherd Sinfonia
9. Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development
10. Short Term Memory May Be the Depletion of the Readily Releasable Pool of Presynaptic Neurotransmitter Vesicles