The name is absent



Table 2: Description of the Environmental Groups

Groups

Description

Number of
variables

AIRPOL

Air Pollution

6

INDOOR

Indoor Air Pollution Potential

9

GHGS

Green House Gases (GHGs) Emissions

6

ENERGY

Pollution from Energy Generation and Consumption

6

FOREST

Depletion and Degradation of Forest Resources

8

WATER

Depletion and Degradation of Water Resources

12

NPSP

Nonpoint Source Water Pollution Potential

10

LAND

Pressure and Degradation of Land Resources

6

Total

63

For the analysis on education, we use the data available from
the " 
7th All India Educational Survey (AIES): All India School Education
Survey (AISES)'',
published by NCERT (2002). On the health front, IMR
data is taken from Sample Registration System (SRS) Bulletins; Registrar
General of India, New Delhi and LE data is taken from Indiastat database
website (
www.indiastat.com). The data on EG of the States is obtained
from EPW Research Foundation Database Software and RBI's Database
on Indian Economy.

20

4. The Results

4.1 EQI

In Table 3, we present the EQ scores and rankings of the
States for Period A, both for individual categories as well as for the
composite index. It is observed that Kerala, Karnataka and Maharashtra
were the toppers during this period, while Uttar Pradesh, Punjab and
Haryana had been the laggards. Interestinglythetopper Kerala, despite
a good performance in AIRPOL, GHGS, ENERGY, WATER and NPSP,
fared among the laggards in case of INDOOR, LAND and FOREST.
Karnataka had good performance in case of AIRPOL and GHGS, while
maintaining moderate performance in other categories. The third ranking
of Maharashtra, an industrialized state, is justified by the fact that the
State performed appreciably in several categories like INDOOR, GHGS,
LAND and NPSP, however the performance with respect to ENERGY,
WATER, FOREST and AIRPOL was not that satisfactory. Looking at the
other extreme, we can see that the overall rankings of laggards like
Haryana and Uttar Pradesh were influenced by their performance in
sub-categories like LAND, NPSP etc. It is observed that while some
major States like Madhya Pradesh (tenth) and West Bengal (ninth)
placed in the lower segment, others like Gujarat (sixth) and Andhra
Pradesh (seventh) had performed moderately well. Interestingly, a
relatively poorer State, Orissa, obtained the fourth rank, owing to
comparatively better performance in case of AIRPOL, ENERGY and
WATER.

21



More intriguing information

1. The Dictator and the Parties A Study on Policy Co-operation in Mineral Economies
2. The name is absent
3. Momentum in Australian Stock Returns: An Update
4. The name is absent
5. Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates
6. INTERACTION EFFECTS OF PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND PRICE SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR U.S. COTTON
7. Trade and Empire, 1700-1870
8. The name is absent
9. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 11
10. Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Development in the United States