The name is absent



Current Agriculture, Food & Resource Issues

D. Surprenant and J.-P. Gervais


commitment                               commitment and

tariffs

Figure 2 Importers’ preferences towards TRQ liberalization scenarios in the Canadian
chicken industry.


36.6 percent were from the province of Quebec while the remaining firms operated in
other Canadian provinces. The sample is representative of the geographic concentration of
the industry since, of all importers listed with Foreign Affairs and International Trade,
40.4 percent are located in Quebec.

The upcoming round of negotiations in agriculture will surely encompass a broad
agenda of topics in agri-food trade. A number of TRQ liberalization scenarios will likely
be discussed. The second question in the survey was designed to evaluate importers’
qualitative judgments of Canadian import policy in the chicken industry. Importers were
asked which type of import policy they would support in comparison with the current
trade system. Figure 2 shows the preferences of Canadian chicken importers relative to
various TRQ liberalization scenarios. Of the importers surveyed, 40.5 percent wish to
have the minimum access commitment (MAC) expanded above the current negotiated
access of 7.5 percent of the previous year’s domestic production. A significant proportion
of importers (25.2 percent) support the status quo in terms of access. Alternatively,
8.1 percent of the importers would like Canadian negotiators to argue for a more
protectionist position. Liberalization through a simultaneous reduction in the over-quota
tariff and an increase in the MAC is supported by 9.9 percent of the importers. Simply
reducing over-quota tariffs to stimulate trade liberalization is supported by a meagre
2.7 percent of the importers surveyed. Some firms (13.6 percent) think that market access
negotiations should be undertaken through other means.

The next section of the survey directly addresses the administration procedures of the
TRQ. Figure 3 shows that a large portion of the importers surveyed (46.4 percent) prefer
preserving the current allocation scheme. An administration method strictly based upon
historical market shares is the next preferred alternative of importers. A licence-on-
demand type of allocation receives 17 percent of all support. Non-discretionary types of
allocation, specifically first-come-first-served or an auction, collect levels of support of
68



More intriguing information

1. National urban policy responses in the European Union: Towards a European urban policy?
2. Learning and Endogenous Business Cycles in a Standard Growth Model
3. Spousal Labor Market Effects from Government Health Insurance: Evidence from a Veterans Affairs Expansion
4. THE CO-EVOLUTION OF MATTER AND CONSCIOUSNESS1
5. The name is absent
6. Workforce or Workfare?
7. The name is absent
8. Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations
9. Review of “From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the Social and Historical Evolution of Economic Theory”
10. The name is absent
11. Experience, Innovation and Productivity - Empirical Evidence from Italy's Slowdown
12. Transfer from primary school to secondary school
13. The name is absent
14. DISCUSSION: ASSESSING STRUCTURAL CHANGE IN THE DEMAND FOR FOOD COMMODITIES
15. The Effects of Reforming the Chinese Dual-Track Price System
16. Automatic Dream Sentiment Analysis
17. Credit Markets and the Propagation of Monetary Policy Shocks
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. ASSESSMENT OF MARKET RISK IN HOG PRODUCTION USING VALUE-AT-RISK AND EXTREME VALUE THEORY