sufficient for optimality.
As in the closed economy model, we restrict the analysis to symmetric equilibria in
which identical agents make identical choices, implying, c + a ≡ C + A. Substituting this
relationship into (3.5a) and combining with (3.5c), we obtain:
Uc [c + a, s (1)] + U [C + α+ (a1)] ’ (1) = μ — φ = (β + δ)φ - φ (3.6)
which repeats equation (2.11). The optimality conditions for work effort and international
borrowing in the symmetric state remain unchanged.
Consequently, the independent dynamics of the small open economy model corresponds
to the following system of equations
φ =(1+ β + δ) φ — μ (3.7a)
a = c (a, μ, φ) — δa (3.7b)
μ = μ [β — rn(f)] (3.7c)
fι = rn(n)n + c (a,μ, φ) — F [Z(μ)] (3.7d)
where we have substituted for c = c (a, μ, φ) in equations (3.7b, 3.7d) and I = I (μ) in
(3.7d).23 A key distinction between the closed and small open economy models is the ability
of small open economy to borrow (and lend) from abroad. This is reflected in equation
(3.7d), which describes the (negative of) the current account balance. It is the difference
between domestic durable consumption, inclusive of interest service, and domestic output.
Letting φ = i = μ = fι = 0, the long-run equilibrium equals
Uc [(1+ δ>)i,s (1)] + u∙ [(1+фф’ wμ'(1) =(β + δ)φ (3.8a)
(1 ∣ δ ) a
23This instantaneous consumption function, together with its partial derivatives, is the same as in the
closed economy framework, while for I = l(μ), ∂l∕∂μ = — (V'' + μF'') 1 > 0.
18
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Has Competition in the Japanese Banking Sector Improved?
3. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?
4. Experimental Evidence of Risk Aversion in Consumer Markets: The Case of Beef Tenderness
5. Mergers under endogenous minimum quality standard: a note
6. EXPANDING HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE U.K: FROM ‘SYSTEM SLOWDOWN’ TO ‘SYSTEM ACCELERATION’
7. Who runs the IFIs?
8. Measuring and Testing Advertising-Induced Rotation in the Demand Curve
9. PROPOSED IMMIGRATION POLICY REFORM & FARM LABOR MARKET OUTCOMES
10. The name is absent