Density Estimation and Combination under Model Ambiguity



S&P500 index

Min. value

-0.08642

Max. value

0.087089

Mean

0.000319

Std. deviation

0.01005

Kurtosis

4.9333

Skewness

-0.10974

Table I

Furthermore, Ang and Bekaert (2001,2002) and Guidolin and Timmermann (2002) have stressed the
importance of distinguishing between ‘bear’ and ‘bull’ regimes in modeling stock returns and indicate that
these persistent regimes have important economic implications for investors’ portfolio decisions. Based on
these observations, I have chosen to divide the data in two groups. The first contains all samples relative
to contraction (C) and the second includes all samples relative to expansion (E). These two phases of the
business cycle typically coincide with ‘bear’ and ‘bull’ regimes of the stock market. This implies that the
optimal model for asset returns is conditional on the specific regime, which for simplicity I assume to be
known at the time of the empirical analysis. The next table indicates the periods of contraction and expansion
included in the dataset.19

dates

1

2

3

4

C

12/69-11/70

11/73-3/75

7/81-11/82

3/01-10/01

E

4/75-1/80

7/80-7/81

12/82-6/90

4/91-2/01

Table II

Under the assumption that in each regime all subsamples are drawn from a fixed distribution, it is possible
to create for each state a unique sample that include all contractions and all expansions respectively. Merging
together all the recessions we obtain a sample of 1321 observations, while combining all expansions we obtain a
sample of 5921 observations. The descriptive statistics for these two subsamples are reported in the following
tables.

Expansion

S&P500 index

Min. value

-0.08642

Max. value

0.087089

Mean

0.00044

Std. deviation

0.009165

Kurtosis

7.1555

Skewness

-0.30326


Table III


Contraction

S&P500 index

Min. value

-0.05047

Max. value

0.05574

Mean

-0.00039

Std. deviation

0.0132

Kurtosis

1.05685

Skewness

0.26712


It is evident from Table I and III, that these data are not consistent with the common assumption that
the true model for
Xt is the Gaussian distribution. These values confirm previous studies where daily stock
returns have been found to exhibit high excess Kurtosis and negative Skewness for index returns. Further,

19 The contractions and expansions are those provided by NBER’s Business Cycle D ating Committee for the US Economy,
available at the website
www.nber.org/cycles. I have excluded the recession of 1990-91 because of the limited number of
observations that does not allow to estimte the nonparametric density with precision in that subsample.

14



More intriguing information

1. Tax Increment Financing for Optimal Open Space Preservation: an Economic Inquiry
2. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 11
3. Weather Forecasting for Weather Derivatives
4. Julkinen T&K-rahoitus ja sen vaikutus yrityksiin - Analyysi metalli- ja elektroniikkateollisuudesta
5. Strategic Policy Options to Improve Irrigation Water Allocation Efficiency: Analysis on Egypt and Morocco
6. The name is absent
7. What Lessons for Economic Development Can We Draw from the Champagne Fairs?
8. Midwest prospects and the new economy
9. Publication of Foreign Exchange Statistics by the Central Bank of Chile
10. The name is absent
11. Stakeholder Activism, Managerial Entrenchment, and the Congruence of Interests between Shareholders and Stakeholders
12. WP 1 - The first part-time economy in the world. Does it work?
13. Experience, Innovation and Productivity - Empirical Evidence from Italy's Slowdown
14. Group cooperation, inclusion and disaffected pupils: some responses to informal learning in the music classroom
15. A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON UNDERINVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURAL R&D
16. ENERGY-RELATED INPUT DEMAND BY CROP PRODUCERS
17. The name is absent
18. Heavy Hero or Digital Dummy: multimodal player-avatar relations in FINAL FANTASY 7
19. Cultural Diversity and Human Rights: a propos of a minority educational reform
20. The name is absent