Density Estimation and Combination under Model Ambiguity



and it is equal to:


μ
δσ2


The economic agents use the personal model gr|s as if it represented the actual model. The problem
is that assuming
gr|s to be the density function of a Normal random variable, is likely that the model is
misspecified.

What is described next is a characterization of expected utility maximization under ‘risk’ very similar
to Gilboa-Schmilder(2001), that is the decision process is one in which the “decision maker first forms
probabilistic beliefs and then uses them to reduce a decision problem under uncertainty to a decision problem
under risk”. In other words, the use of models selection and combination described in previous sections
helps reducing the degree of model ambiguity, because it shrinks the set of candidate models into a unique
distribution that characterizes the risk of the decision problem.

Example 2: CARA investors with probabilistic belief M (θMj ). In the context of example 1, lets suppose
that the investor instead of assuming that the returns are Normally distributed, builds his probabilistic belief
gr/s as described in section II and III. Moreover, lets assume that the current regime is known. Therefore,
his model for the asset return is equal to
M(θMj ).

Egr|s[U(W(ret,a))] =


KEM(bθMj)[exp(-δaret)]


EM(bMj)[exP(-δar)] = -ʃp(-δar) (XPj(KCI)fj(r,b)))dr

= - Xpj(KcI)  exp(-δar)fj (r, bθ))dr = X pj (KcI)(-Efj (exp(-δar).

jj

If we define t = δa we can rewrite the expected utility function as -E[exp(-tr)], which is the Moment
Generating Function
20 (MGF) after we account for the change in signs. This implies that the expected
utility function, when the expectation is taken under the model
M (θMj ) is equal to

-    pj(KCI)MGFfj(-t),

j

which is nothing more than the weighted average of the Moment Generating Function of each model included
in
M(bθMj ).

It is important to notice that the existence of a closed form solution for the optimal share a is still
guaranteed. However, in this framework the optimal choice not only depends on the risk aversion and on
the moments of the probability law of stock returns, but it also depends on the weights contained in the
model combination. As such, it is affected by the measure of uncertainty about the true structure. Explicit
formulas for each MGF and for the expected utility are provided in the Appendix.

20The Moment Generating Function MGFr(t) = Er(exptr).

19



More intriguing information

1. Testing Gribat´s Law Across Regions. Evidence from Spain.
2. The Dictator and the Parties A Study on Policy Co-operation in Mineral Economies
3. Can a Robot Hear Music? Can a Robot Dance? Can a Robot Tell What it Knows or Intends to Do? Can it Feel Pride or Shame in Company?
4. An Empirical Analysis of the Curvature Factor of the Term Structure of Interest Rates
5. The name is absent
6. L'organisation en réseau comme forme « indéterminée »
7. Rent Dissipation in Chartered Recreational Fishing: Inside the Black Box
8. Improving the Impact of Market Reform on Agricultural Productivity in Africa: How Institutional Design Makes a Difference
9. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers
10. The name is absent
11. Happiness in Eastern Europe
12. PERFORMANCE PREMISES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES FROM PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA
13. The name is absent
14. TECHNOLOGY AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PATENTS AND FIRM LOCATION IN THE SPANISH MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS INDUSTRY.
15. Structural Conservation Practices in U.S. Corn Production: Evidence on Environmental Stewardship by Program Participants and Non-Participants
16. The name is absent
17. The name is absent
18. Demand Potential for Goat Meat in Southern States: Empirical Evidence from a Multi-State Goat Meat Consumer Survey
19. Strategic Investment and Market Integration
20. The name is absent