methods. Nevertheless, if an S-estimator is not applied directly to sam-
ple observations, but rather to the set of all pairwise differences of sample
observations, the resulting generalized S-estimator exhibits higher relative
efficiency for Gaussian data, while preserving its robust properties (Croux et
al., 1994; Stromberg et al., 2000).
2.3 τ -estimators
The S-estimators improve upon M -estimators in terms of their breakdown-
point properties, but at the cost of low Gaussian efficiency. Although one-
step M -estimators based on an initial S-estimate can remedy this deficiency
to a large extent, their exact breakdown properties are not known. One of
alternative approaches, proposed by Yohai and Zamar (1988), extend the
principle of S-estimation in the following way. Assuming that ρ1 and ρ2
are non-negative, even, and continuous functions, the M -estimate s2 (z, θ) =
s2{η(z, θ)} of scale can be defined as in the case of S-estimation,
У ρ ι[ η ( z,θ )/s{η ( z,θ )} ] dFn ( z )
=K=
ρ1(t)dF (t).
Next, the τ -estimate of scale is defined by
(z,θ)=s2
{η(z, θ)}
ρ2[η(z, θ)/s{η(z, θ)}]dFn(z)
and the corresponding τ -estimator of parameters θ is then defined by mini-
mizing the τ -estimate of scale, τ2(z, θ).
15
More intriguing information
1. The Shepherd Sinfonia2. On the Relation between Robust and Bayesian Decision Making
3. Sustainability of economic development and governance patterns in water management - an overview on the reorganisation of public utilities in Campania, Italy, under EU Framework Directive in the field of water policy (2000/60/CE)
4. The Role of Evidence in Establishing Trust in Repositories
5. NATURAL RESOURCE SUPPLY CONSTRAINTS AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS: A COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM APPROACH
6. International Financial Integration*
7. GENE EXPRESSION AND ITS DISCONTENTS Developmental disorders as dysfunctions of epigenetic cognition
8. Achieving the MDGs – A Note
9. Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations
10. The name is absent