Table 5: Multivariate Evidence
This table contains the results of Fama and MacBeth (1973) regressions of
Model (2) as described in the main text. The dependent variable is the indi-
vidual firm’s monthly raw return (Columns 1 and 2) and industry adjusted
return (Columns 3 and 4), respectively. Independent variables are Shrown,
the share of stocks owned by the CEO of the firm; D(10%), a dummy vari-
able that takes on the value one if Shrown is larger than 10%, and zero
otherwise; and the Gompers, Ishii, and Metrick (2003) G-Index. The re-
maining control variables are the same as used by Brennan, Chordia, and
Subrahmanyam (1998) and Gompers, Ishii, and Metrick (2003) and are de-
scribed in detail in Appendix 2 of the latter paper. Numbers are in percent.
Standard errors are in parentheses. ***, **, and * indicate significance at the
one, five, and ten percent level, respectively.
41
More intriguing information
1. A simple enquiry on heterogeneous lending rates and lending behaviour2. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods
3. A Critical Examination of the Beliefs about Learning a Foreign Language at Primary School
4. The name is absent
5. LOCAL CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICE
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAM
9. The name is absent
10. Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion aftereffect between first- and second-order cues and among different second-order cues