Second Order Filter Distribution Approximations for Financial Time Series with Extreme Outlier



J.Q. Smith and Antonio Santos

statistics that characterize the distribution. Secondly, we must be able to imple-
ment these procedures sequentially as states evolve over time and new information
becomes available. This implementation needs to be efficient and the approxima-
tions need to remain good as we move through the sequence of states.

There are several ways of sampling from f (αtDt). Typically we simulate from
an approximating density
g(αt). After a draw is obtained from the approximating
density, it is modified to make it a draw from
f(αtDt). The two most popular
techniques for performing this modification are sampling importance resampling
(SIR) and rejection sampling/Markov chain Monte Carlo (Gilks, Richardson, and
Spiegelhalter 1996; Gamerman 1997; Robert and Casella 1999; Doucet, de Freitas,
and Gordon 2001; Liu 2001).

There are always errors associated with the approximation of distributions with
continuous support from a discrete mass function. However, ignoring this aspect
of approximating error, the effective implementation of the particle filter depends
on how well we approximate
f (αtDt) by g (αt). If we could sample directly from
f (αtDt), then the sample would be independent and identically distributed and the
numerical approximation would depend only on the number of draws. On the other
hand, when it is not possible to sample directly from
f (αtDt), it becomes crucial
to define good approximations
g (αt). Here we suggest how this might be done for
a stock market return series.

We essentially use the SIR method to sample from the distribution of interest.
Taking into account the structure of the model, equation (3) can be used to define
the approximating density
g (αt), and subsequently its associated modifications.
When a set of particles is used to approximate
f (αt-1 Dt-1), t-1,1, . . . , αt-1,m}
with respective weights t-1,1 , . . . , πt-1,m}, each particle is used to define the den-
sity
f ( αtDt ) α f ( ytαt ) f ( αtαt- ɪ ,j ), j = 1 ,...,m. The approximating density

G.E.M.F - F.E.U.C.



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Bidding for Envy-Freeness: A Procedural Approach to n-Player Fair Division Problems
3. APPLICATIONS OF DUALITY THEORY TO AGRICULTURE
4. Knowledge, Innovation and Agglomeration - regionalized multiple indicators and evidence from Brazil
5. Change in firm population and spatial variations: The case of Turkey
6. Tobacco and Alcohol: Complements or Substitutes? - A Statistical Guinea Pig Approach
7. Concerns for Equity and the Optimal Co-Payments for Publicly Provided Health Care
8. Regional dynamics in mountain areas and the need for integrated policies
9. The name is absent
10. The mental map of Dutch entrepreneurs. Changes in the subjective rating of locations in the Netherlands, 1983-1993-2003
11. The name is absent
12. International Financial Integration*
13. The name is absent
14. The Challenge of Urban Regeneration in Deprived European Neighbourhoods - a Partnership Approach
15. The Demand for Specialty-Crop Insurance: Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard
16. Multifunctionality of Agriculture: An Inquiry Into the Complementarity Between Landscape Preservation and Food Security
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. 09-01 "Resources, Rules and International Political Economy: The Politics of Development in the WTO"
20. The name is absent