Table 5
Results by Wife's Health Insurance Receipt
|
Wife Had Employer-Provided Health |
Wife Without Employer-Provided Health | |||
|
______________(1) |
_______________(2) |
________________(3) |
________________(4)_____________ | |
|
_____________________Panel I: |
Work outcomes_____ | |||
|
Not Working |
_________Part Time |
__ Not Working |
__________Part Time________ | |
|
veteran*post |
-0.0216** |
0.0181* |
-0.0140 |
-0.0407** |
|
(0.0062) |
(0.0076) |
(0.0089) |
(0.0151) | |
|
veteran |
0.0249** |
-0.0147* |
0.0152* |
0.0103 |
|
(0.0035) |
(0.0058) |
(0.0063) |
(0.0120) | |
|
Sig different? |
Yes |
Yes | ||
|
Observations________ |
___________14,063 |
____________11,044 |
___________26,532 |
____________11,465__________ |
|
____________________Panel II: |
Hours Outcomes_____ | |||
|
Hrs Worked |
_____Hrs Worked|hrs>0 |
__ Hrs Worked |
_____Hrs Worked|hrs>0 | |
|
veteran*post |
0.3765 |
-0.5850* |
0.7653** |
1.0810* |
|
(0.3853) |
(0.2279) |
(0.2487) |
(0.4673) | |
|
veteran |
-0.5319+ |
0.4188* |
-0.5718** |
-0.4936 |
|
(0.2922) |
(0.1811) |
(0.1349) |
(0.3564) | |
|
Yes |
Yes | |||
|
Observations________ |
___________14,129 |
____________11,083 |
___________26,573 |
____________10,791__________ |
|
__________________Panel III: |
Earnings Outcomes | |||
|
Earnings |
_________ln(Earnings) |
__ Earnings |
_________ln(Earnings)_______ | |
|
veteran*post |
3.1239 |
-0.0300 |
0.2210 |
0.2244** |
|
(5.6723) |
(0.0245) |
(3.1185) |
(0.0521) | |
|
veteran |
0.5759 |
0.0699** |
2.4344 |
-0.0892* |
|
(4.2682) |
(0.0174) |
(1.5601) |
(0.0357) | |
|
No |
Yes | |||
|
Observations |
___________3,420 |
___________2,660 |
____________6,396 |
____________2,099__________ |
Note: Coefficient estimates are taken from equation (1). Panel I reports the marginal effects from a probit
regression. PanelsllandllreportresultsfromanOLS regression. Eamingsarein 1982-1984 dollars using the
BLS CPI inflator. Regressions include race, and a full set of state, year, age, and education dummies and a
constant. Robust standard errors in parentheses are clustered on veteran and year.
* Significantat 5%; ** Significantat 1%
More intriguing information
1. Models of Cognition: Neurological possibility does not indicate neurological plausibility.2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Changing spatial planning systems and the role of the regional government level; Comparing the Netherlands, Flanders and England
5. Menarchial Age of Secondary School Girls in Urban and Rural Areas of Rivers State, Nigeria
6. The name is absent
7. Citizenship
8. Testing for One-Factor Models versus Stochastic Volatility Models
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent