http://clevelandfed.org/research/workpaper α
Best available copy ~-'~
in the lowest market-value (price) qui ntile.8 The SIZE (PRICE) portfolios
are constructed to disentangle price (size) effects from size (price) effects
in the MV (PR) portfolios.
To investigate the presence of factor-related TOY premiums in the returns
of the portfolios, mean returns are computed for the MV, PR, SIZE, PRICE, and
MVPR portfolios over five subsample periods:
D the sample period = all but the last five observations in the sample;
2) the pre-yearend period = last five trading days of each calendar year;
3) the post-yearend period = first five trading days of each calendar year;
4) the TOY period = pre-yearend period + post-yearend period;
5) adjusted-year period = sample period - TOY period.
The last five observations are dropped when computing mean returns for each
subsample because they correspond to the pre-yearend period for 1982 and there
is no corresponding post-yearend period for 1983 in the sample. This partic-
ular partitioning of the sample is done for three reasons. First, the empiri-
cal evidence of Reinganum [22] and Keim [15] indicates that the bulk of the
TOY premium lies in the first five trading days of January. Second, Roll [23]
uses the 10 trading days centered on the end of the calendar year as the TOY
period. Finally, prior to the Tax Reform Act cf 1986, an installment-sale
option for capital gains was available to investors during the last five frad-
ing days of December.9
Table 1 indicates that there is a significant size- or price-related
effect in the returns of the MV and PR portfolios during the TOY and
post-yearend periods. We are unable to reject the hypothesis that the mean
returns are equal across size (price) deciles for the sample period, the
adjusted-year period, and the pre-yearend period for both the MV and PR
portfolios. Table 2 shows that once price is accounted for, the significant
size effect found during the TOY and the post-yearend periods disappears.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. El impacto espacial de las economías de aglomeración y su efecto sobre la estructura urbana.El caso de la industria en Barcelona, 1986-1996
4. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
5. Perfect Regular Equilibrium
6. A model-free approach to delta hedging
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Auction Design without Commitment
10. What Lessons for Economic Development Can We Draw from the Champagne Fairs?