A Regional Core, Adjacent, Periphery Model for National Economic Geography Analysis



46
[Figure 3]

Table 1

Classification of NUTS 2 Regions into: Core, Adjacent, Periphery, and Island Periphery

Description of Area Types

Core

1    C    = a single city region

2    C1   = multiple city region with no employment in agriculture

3   C2   = contains one or more urban area’s (UA) with a population density ≥ 2 thousand / km2

4    C3   = contains one or more urban area’s with a population density ≥ 1 thousand / km2

5    C4   = contains one or more urban area’s with a population density ≥ 500 / km2

6 C5   = a single national urban area with a population density (PD) < 500 / km2

Adjacent

7   A   = any adjacent region which completely surrounds a core region

8   A1   = any region adjacent to a core with one or more UA’s with a PD between 100 - 500 / km2

9   A2   = any region adjacent to a core with one or more UA’s with a PD between 50 - 99 / km2

10  A3   = any region adjacent to a core with one or more UA’s with a PD less than 50 / km2

pERipHERY

11   P1   = a region bordering on an adjacent or other periphery with one or more UA’s with PD ≥100 / km2

12  P2   = a region bordering on an adjacent or other periphery with one or more UA’s with PD ≥ 50 / km2

13  P3   = a region bordering on an adjacent or other periphery with one or more UA’s with PD ≥ 20 / km2

14  P4   = a region bordering on an adjacent or other periphery with one or more UA’s with PD < 20 / km2

isLAND pERipHERY

15  iP1  = a peripheral island region with one or more UA’s with a PD ≥100 / km2

16  iP2  = a peripheral island region with one or more UA’s with a PD ≥ 50, / km2

17  iP3  = a peripheral island region with one or more UA’s with a PD between 20 - 49 / km2

18  IP4  = a peripheral island region with one or more UA’s with a PD < 20 / km2

source: Author’s own regional classification format. UA = urban area; pD = population density

[Figure 4]

Table 2

EU 15 Regional Classification 1990

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

N

Country________

C

A

P

IP

Total

1

Belgium

6

5

11

2

Denmark

1

3

9

1

14

3

Germany

29

7

2

38

4

Greece

1

2

6

4

13

5

Spain

4

7

5

2

18

6

France

1

5

15

1

22

7

Ireland

1

3

4

8

8

Italy

5

11

2

2

20

9

Luxembourg

1

1

10

Netherlands

5

4

3

12

11

Austria

1

1

7

9

12

Portugal

2

2

1

2

7

13

Finland

1

1

3

1

6

14

Sweden

1

1

6

8

15

UK________

14

16

5

35

Total_____________

72

69

68

“13

222

source: Author’s own calculation.

[Figure 5]

Table 3

Detailed EU 15 Region Classification 1990

(1)

(2)__

(3)

________________(4) _______________

(5)

___________________(6)

(7)

N

Country C C1 C2 C3 C4 C5

TC

A A1 A2 A3 TA P1 P2 P3 P4

TP

IP1 IP2 IP3 IP4 TPI

Total

1

Belgium    1           5

6

1 4            5

0

11

2

Denmark           1

1

2 1       3 3 6_________

9

1_______________ 1

14___



More intriguing information

1. NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. ISSUES IN NONMARKET VALUATION AND POLICY APPLICATION: A RETROSPECTIVE GLANCE
6. A Multimodal Framework for Computer Mediated Learning: The Reshaping of Curriculum Knowledge and Learning
7. Conditions for learning: partnerships for engaging secondary pupils with contemporary art.
8. The name is absent
9. Firm Closure, Financial Losses and the Consequences for an Entrepreneurial Restart
10. Strengthening civil society from the outside? Donor driven consultation and participation processes in Poverty Reduction Strategies (PRSP): the Bolivian case