46
[Figure 3]
Table 1
Classification of NUTS 2 Regions into: Core, Adjacent, Periphery, and Island Periphery
Description of Area Types
Core
1 C = a single city region
2 C1 = multiple city region with no employment in agriculture
3 C2 = contains one or more urban area’s (UA) with a population density ≥ 2 thousand / km2
4 C3 = contains one or more urban area’s with a population density ≥ 1 thousand / km2
5 C4 = contains one or more urban area’s with a population density ≥ 500 / km2
6 C5 = a single national urban area with a population density (PD) < 500 / km2
Adjacent
7 A = any adjacent region which completely surrounds a core region
8 A1 = any region adjacent to a core with one or more UA’s with a PD between 100 - 500 / km2
9 A2 = any region adjacent to a core with one or more UA’s with a PD between 50 - 99 / km2
10 A3 = any region adjacent to a core with one or more UA’s with a PD less than 50 / km2
pERipHERY
11 P1 = a region bordering on an adjacent or other periphery with one or more UA’s with PD ≥100 / km2
12 P2 = a region bordering on an adjacent or other periphery with one or more UA’s with PD ≥ 50 / km2
13 P3 = a region bordering on an adjacent or other periphery with one or more UA’s with PD ≥ 20 / km2
14 P4 = a region bordering on an adjacent or other periphery with one or more UA’s with PD < 20 / km2
isLAND pERipHERY
15 iP1 = a peripheral island region with one or more UA’s with a PD ≥100 / km2
16 iP2 = a peripheral island region with one or more UA’s with a PD ≥ 50, / km2
17 iP3 = a peripheral island region with one or more UA’s with a PD between 20 - 49 / km2
18 IP4 = a peripheral island region with one or more UA’s with a PD < 20 / km2
source: Author’s own regional classification format. UA = urban area; pD = population density
[Figure 4]
Table 2
EU 15 Regional Classification 1990
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) |
(7) |
N |
Country________ |
C |
A |
P |
IP |
Total |
1 |
Belgium |
6 |
5 |
11 | ||
2 |
Denmark |
1 |
3 |
9 |
1 |
14 |
3 |
Germany |
29 |
7 |
2 |
38 | |
4 |
Greece |
1 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
13 |
5 |
Spain |
4 |
7 |
5 |
2 |
18 |
6 |
France |
1 |
5 |
15 |
1 |
22 |
7 |
Ireland |
1 |
3 |
4 |
8 | |
8 |
Italy |
5 |
11 |
2 |
2 |
20 |
9 |
Luxembourg |
1 |
1 | |||
10 |
Netherlands |
5 |
4 |
3 |
12 | |
11 |
Austria |
1 |
1 |
7 |
9 | |
12 |
Portugal |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
13 |
Finland |
1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
6 |
14 |
Sweden |
1 |
1 |
6 |
8 | |
15 |
UK________ |
14 |
16 |
5 |
35 | |
Total_____________ |
72 |
69 |
68 |
“13 |
222 |
source: Author’s own calculation.
[Figure 5]
Table 3
Detailed EU 15 Region Classification 1990
(1) |
(2)__ |
(3) |
________________(4) _______________ |
(5) |
___________________(6) |
(7) |
N |
Country C C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 |
TC |
A A1 A2 A3 TA P1 P2 P3 P4 |
TP |
IP1 IP2 IP3 IP4 TPI |
Total |
1 |
Belgium 1 5 |
6 |
1 4 5 |
0 |
11 | |
2 |
Denmark 1 |
1 |
2 1 3 3 6_________ |
9 |
1_______________ 1 |
14___ |
More intriguing information
1. NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. ISSUES IN NONMARKET VALUATION AND POLICY APPLICATION: A RETROSPECTIVE GLANCE
6. A Multimodal Framework for Computer Mediated Learning: The Reshaping of Curriculum Knowledge and Learning
7. Conditions for learning: partnerships for engaging secondary pupils with contemporary art.
8. The name is absent
9. Firm Closure, Financial Losses and the Consequences for an Entrepreneurial Restart
10. Strengthening civil society from the outside? Donor driven consultation and participation processes in Poverty Reduction Strategies (PRSP): the Bolivian case