Table A2 (continued)
|
Peru | |||||
|
P-r |
r |
Eig.Value |
Trace |
Frac95 |
P-Value |
|
2 |
0 |
0.863 |
34.533 |
16.537 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
0.684 |
12.682 |
7.735 |
0.004 |
|
Turkey | |||||
|
P-r |
r |
Eig.Value |
Trace |
Frac95 |
P-Value |
|
2 |
0 |
0.659 |
19.69 |
16.079 |
0.012 |
|
1 |
1 |
0.432 |
6.786 |
7.253 |
0.073 |
|
Uruguay | |||||
|
P-r |
r |
Eig.Value |
Trace |
Frac95 |
P-Value |
|
2 |
0 |
0.849 |
25.763 |
16.404 |
0.001 |
|
1 |
1 |
0.363 |
4.953 |
7.712 |
0.188 |
|
Venezuela | |||||
|
P-r |
r |
Eig.Value |
Trace |
Frac95 |
P-Value |
|
2 |
0 |
0.944 |
36.86 |
16.303 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
0.377 |
5.214 |
7.782 |
0.162 |
|
Chile | |||||
|
P-r |
r |
Eig.Value |
Trace |
Frac95 |
P-Value |
|
2 |
0 |
0.726 |
21.377 |
16.245 |
0.007 |
|
1 |
1 |
0.477 |
7.124 |
7.524 |
0.063 |
|
Hungary | |||||
|
P-r |
r |
Eig.Value |
Trace |
Frac95 |
P-Value |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
102.65 |
1 16.39 |
3 0.00 |
|
1 |
1 |
0.634 |
11.06 |
2 7.51 |
2 0.01 |
|
Pakistan | |||||
|
P-r |
r |
Eig.Value |
Trace |
Frac95 |
P-Value |
|
2 |
0 |
0.7 |
19.498 |
15.952 |
0.015 |
|
1 |
1 |
0.344 |
5.065 |
7.72 |
0.18 |
|
South Africa | |||||
|
P-r |
r |
Eig.Value |
Trace |
Frac95 |
P-Value |
|
2 |
0 |
0.999 |
85.246 |
16.216 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
0.556 |
8.942 |
7.633 |
0.025 |
44
More intriguing information
1. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln2. The name is absent
3. Expectations, money, and the forecasting of inflation
4. NVESTIGATING LEXICAL ACQUISITION PATTERNS: CONTEXT AND COGNITION
5. The name is absent
6. Developments and Development Directions of Electronic Trade Platforms in US and European Agri-Food Markets: Impact on Sector Organization
7. Policy Formulation, Implementation and Feedback in EU Merger Control
8. The name is absent
9. ALTERNATIVE TRADE POLICIES
10. Declining Discount Rates: Evidence from the UK