Table 3: Weighted systems GMM production function long-run estimates a, UK 1996-2004 (Eq. 5)
|
Industries: Independent variables--.^ |
_______AGF______ |
_______FBT_______ |
_______TCL_____ |
______WPP______ | ||||
|
β |
t- stat |
β |
t- stat |
β |
t- stat |
β |
t- stat | |
|
ln gross outputt-1 |
0.191 |
1.84 |
0.062 |
0.74 |
0.230 |
2.69 |
0.159 |
1.46 |
|
ln M x EXP_always |
1.010 |
4.13 |
0.686 |
4.36 |
0.848 |
6.90 |
0.803 |
4.01 |
|
ln M x EXP_never |
0.423 |
5.15 |
0.696 |
21.05 |
0.433 |
18.71 |
0.606 |
5.03 |
|
ln M x EXP_entry |
0.939 |
4.48 |
0.675 |
5.57 |
0.841 |
7.79 |
0.519 |
3.22 |
|
ln M x EXP_exit |
0.523 |
1.98 |
0.874 |
12.77 |
0.635 |
8.75 |
0.539 |
3.31 |
|
ln M x EXP_both |
1.142 |
1.94 |
0.553 |
7.92 |
0.804 |
7.27 |
0.488 |
3.65 |
|
ln K x EXP_always |
0.102 |
2.14 |
0.113 |
3.32 |
0.119 |
2.41 |
0.151 |
2.61 |
|
ln K x EXP_never |
0.155 |
2.52 |
0.170 |
4.01 |
0.179 |
3.03 |
0.245 |
2.78 |
|
ln K x EXP_entry |
0.048 |
1.89 |
0.066 |
2.62 |
0.161 |
2.40 |
0.225 |
2.37 |
|
ln K x EXP_exit |
0.420 |
1.90 |
0.112 |
1.89 |
0.142 |
2.36 |
0.269 |
2.14 |
|
ln K x EXP_both |
0.106 |
1.06 |
0.272 |
3.96 |
0.144 |
1.83 |
0.248 |
2.74 |
|
ln E x EXP_always |
0.049 |
2.87 |
0.268 |
2.55 |
0.160 |
2.23 |
0.148 |
3.06 |
|
ln E x EXP_never |
0.200 |
3.00 |
0.216 |
4.53 |
0.189 |
2.64 |
0.296 |
3.54 |
|
ln E x EXP_entry |
0.089 |
2.03 |
0.475 |
4.20 |
0.074 |
2.28 |
0.338 |
3.63 |
|
ln E x EXP_exit |
0.150 |
2.77 |
0.130 |
4.92 |
0.190 |
2.67 |
0.218 |
1.93 |
|
ln E x EXP_both |
0.188 |
2.98 |
0.207 |
3.10 |
0.095 |
1.92 |
0.296 |
2.95 |
|
t x EXP_both |
0.134 |
3.07 |
0.039 |
2.20 |
0.004 |
0.25 |
0.030 |
1.56 |
|
t x EXP_never |
0.016 |
1.54 |
0.006 |
1.08 |
0.004 |
0.18 |
0.004 |
0.53 |
|
t x EXP_entry |
0.023 |
0.61 |
-0.014 |
-1.33 |
-0.023 |
-0.96 |
0.004 |
0.20 |
|
t x EXP_exit |
0.013 |
0.12 |
0.026 |
1.17 |
0.039 |
0.61 |
0.025 |
1.15 |
|
t x EXP_always |
-0.005 |
-0.38 |
0.006 |
1.12 |
-0.003 |
-0.44 |
-0.021 |
-1.08 |
|
EXP_entry t+1 |
0.061 |
0.99 |
-0.013 |
-0.15 |
0.066 |
0.32 |
0.678 |
1.87 |
|
EXP_entry t |
-0.012 |
-0.16 |
0.117 |
2.31 |
0.173 |
0.81 |
-0.228 |
-0.52 |
|
EXP_entry t-1 |
-0.066 |
-0.71 |
-0.019 |
-0.28 |
-0.094 |
-1.13 |
-0.238 |
-1.99 |
|
EXP_exit t+1 |
0.084 |
0.67 |
-0.126 |
-1.83 |
-0.284 |
-1.83 |
0.107 |
0.38 |
|
EXP_exit t |
0.133 |
0.45 |
-0.054 |
-0.62 |
-0.072 |
-0.44 |
0.118 |
0.88 |
|
EXP_exit t-1 |
-0.447 |
-0.53 |
-0.049 |
-1.23 |
0.157 |
1.31 |
-0.236 |
-1.64 |
|
EXP_both t+1 |
0.689 |
4.66 |
-0.021 |
-0.30 |
-0.086 |
-1.10 |
0.076 |
0.91 |
|
EXP_both t |
0.042 |
0.33 |
0.211 |
2.08 |
-0.153 |
-1.57 |
-0.013 |
-0.15 |
|
EXP_both t-1 |
0.260 |
1.42 |
-0.104 |
-1.80 |
0.110 |
0.94 |
0.057 |
1.09 |
|
Constant x EXP_always |
1.281 |
1.05 |
2.344 |
2.75 |
-0.628 |
-0.85 |
1.548 |
0.68 |
|
Constant x EXP_never |
1.122 |
0.89 |
-0.884 |
-1.07 |
2.535 |
3.31 |
-0.705 |
-0.31 |
|
Constant x EXP_entry |
0.001 |
0.00 |
-0.261 |
-0.26 |
0.103 |
0.09 |
0.716 |
0.32 |
|
Constant x EXP_exit |
0.272 |
0.07 |
-1.085 |
-1.36 |
1.427 |
1.49 |
0.249 |
0.11 |
|
Constant x EXP_both |
-4.562 |
-0.73 |
-1.557 |
-1.96 |
0.500 |
0.45 |
1.793 |
0.71 |
|
Industry dummies |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes | ||||
|
Region dummies |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes | ||||
|
Diagnostic statistics |
1702 |
3065 |
2223 |
6903 | ||||
|
No. of groups |
508 |
741 |
530 |
1798 | ||||
|
Hansen-test ( χ2 ) |
107.15 |
185.96 |
150.91 |
265.83 | ||||
|
AR(1) z-statistic |
-3.24*** |
- - _ _* |
_ _ _ ** -2.29 |
_ _ *** -2.91 | ||||
|
AR(2) z-statistic_______________ |
_________1.08 |
0.738 |
1.48 |
-0.76 | ||||
The lagged coefficient on the dependent variable is also reported in order to assess its adjustment speed.
Notes: Refer to Table 2 for details of industry group codes. The 2-step GMM system estimator in STATA 9 is used; the
instrument set includes lagged values of the RHS variables in the model as well as ln Ageit and Intang it . Standard errors are
obtained using the ‘delta’ method.***/**/* significant at the 1%/5%/10% level.
23
More intriguing information
1. Errors in recorded security prices and the turn-of-the year effect2. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS' WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR REAL-TIME MESOSCALE WEATHER INFORMATION
3. THE CO-EVOLUTION OF MATTER AND CONSCIOUSNESS1
4. Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry
5. The Triangular Relationship between the Commission, NRAs and National Courts Revisited
6. sycnoιogιcaι spaces
7. The name is absent
8. An Estimated DSGE Model of the Indian Economy.
9. The Nobel Memorial Prize for Robert F. Engle
10. The name is absent