Incremental Risk Vulnerability
10
We analyse the agent’s derived risk aversion r(w) in the presence of only the y-risk and the
derived risk aversion ^(w) in the presence of the (y + e)-risk. For this purpose we define
re (w + y) as the derived risk aversion over the e-risk, given the income (w + y).
re(w + y) ≡
Ee[-u"(w + y + e)] _
Ee[u'(w + y + e)] ;
∀(w + y).
Proposition 2 provides sufficient conditions for the e-risk to raise the agent’s risk aversion.
Proposition 2 Let e be a random variable which is distributed independently of w, but per-
haps dependently on y . In case of dependence, the distribution of e improves with increasing
y according to second-order stochastic dominance.
Then
ʌ . . .
r(w) ≥ ^(w), ∀ w,
if
re(w + y) ≥ r(w + y), ∀ (w + y),
and
dre(w + y)/dy ≤ 0, ∀ (w, y).
(4)
(5)
This proposition is proved in Appendix 2. Condition (4) requires the risk aversion of an
agent with income w + y to be higher in the presence of the background risk, e. Condition
(4) rules out a subset of the second-order stochastic dominance increases in background
risk as analysed by Eeckhoudt, Gollier and Schlesinger (1996). It also rules out a simple
mean preserving spread since y2 >y1 does not imply y2 + ∆(y2) >y1 + ∆(y1). Condition
(5) requires the derived risk aversion re(w + y) to decline. For a small e-risk, condition
(5) implies declining risk aversion of u. Hence condition (5) requires this property to be
preserved under the e-risk.
Both conditions are quite natural given a utility function with declining risk aversion. The
following corollaries illustrate Proposition 2.
Corollary 6 The increase in background risk from y to (y +e) raises the derived risk aver-
sion if e is a random variable, distributed independently of y, with nonpositive expectation
and if the agent is risk vulnerable.
More intriguing information
1. Gender and headship in the twenty-first century2. FUTURE TRADE RESEARCH AREAS THAT MATTER TO DEVELOPING COUNTRY POLICYMAKERS
3. Modellgestützte Politikberatung im Naturschutz: Zur „optimalen“ Flächennutzung in der Agrarlandschaft des Biosphärenreservates „Mittlere Elbe“
4. European Integration: Some stylised facts
5. Revisiting The Bell Curve Debate Regarding the Effects of Cognitive Ability on Wages
6. The name is absent
7. Climate Policy under Sustainable Discounted Utilitarianism
8. Family, social security and social insurance: General remarks and the present discussion in Germany as a case study
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent