Constrained School Choice



• - [Ergin-acyclicity X -acyclicity]:
f
s1 = i1, i2 and fs2 = i2, i1 , qs1 = qs2 = 1;

• - [Ergin-acyclicity strong X -acyclicity]: follows from [strong X -acyclicity
X -acyclicity] and - [Ergin-acyclicity X -acyclicity];

• - [Kesten-acyclicity X -acyclicity]:
f
s1 = i1, i2 and fs2 = i2, i1 , qs1 = qs2 = 1;

• - [Kesten-acyclicity strong X -acyclicity]: follows from [strong X -acyclicity
X -acyclicity] and - [Kesten-acyclicity X -acyclicity];

• - [X -acyclicity Ergin-acyclicity]:

fs1 = i1, i4, i5 , i2 , i3 and fs2 = i2 , i4, i5, i3 , i1 , qs1 = qs2 = 2.

Finally, we give an example of a priority structure that satisfies the requirements that are
associated with each of the 7 nodes in Figure 1. Note that all examples can be extended to
incorporate additional students or schools by (1) giving additional students lower priority
and (2) introducing multiple copies of the priority ordering of an existing school.

1. fs1 = i1, i2 and fs2 = i2, i1 , qs1 = qs2 = 1;

2. fs1 = i1, i2, i3, i4 and fs2 = i3, i1, i4, i2, qs1 = 1 and qs2 = 2;

3. any f where schools have identical priority over students;

4. fs1 = i1, i2, i3 and fs2 = i3, i1, i2, qs1 = 1 and qs2 = 3;

5. Example 2 in Kesten (2006) which is given by fs1 = i1, i2, i3 and fs2 = i3, i1, i2,
q
s1 = 1 and qs2 = 2;

6. fs1 = i1, i2 , i3 and fs2 = i3 , i2 , i1 , qs1 = 1 and qs2 = 1;

7. fs1 = i1, i4, i5, i2, i3 and fs2 = i2, i4, i5, i3, i1, qs1 = qs2 = 2.

23



More intriguing information

1. Antidote Stocking at Hospitals in North Palestine
2. Quelles politiques de développement durable au Mali et à Madagascar ?
3. The name is absent
4. Personal Income Tax Elasticity in Turkey: 1975-2005
5. Developing vocational practice in the jewelry sector through the incubation of a new ‘project-object’
6. The name is absent
7. Are Japanese bureaucrats politically stronger than farmers?: The political economy of Japan's rice set-aside program
8. Motivations, Values and Emotions: Three Sides of the same Coin
9. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
10. How much do Educational Outcomes Matter in OECD Countries?