ANTI-COMPETITIVE FINANCIAL CONTRACTING: THE DESIGN OF FINANCIAL CLAIMS.



Appendix: Proof of Lemma 1

Substitute RbH = RbL + Ψ0(e) throughout and write the first order conditions
for e and
RbL :

(1) L = RH - Rl - Ψ0(e) - 00(e) + λ [eΨ00(e)] = 0

(2)RL = -1 + λ 0 and (-1 + λ)RbL = 0

where λ is the Lagrange multiplier for the (IR) constraint.

(i) If (IR) does not bind at the optimum, then λ =0 and eM is determined
by
RH - RL = Ψ0(eM) + eMΨ00(eM). From Ψ00(e)>0 and the definition of the
first best effort e*, it follows e < e*. As (IR) is slack, λ = 0 and thus RL = 0.
For this to be the case, the level of effort must satisfy: eMΨ0(eM) -Ψ(eM) W,
i.e. it must be
W W1.

(ii) Suppose instead that W>W1. Then the contract in (i) cannot be the
solution to the program, as it fails to satisfy (IR). Then, either
RbH or RbL must
be raised. As
eM < e*, it is optimal to raise only the entrepreneur’s payment
in the high state, so as to raise his e
ffort. Therefore, RbH = Ψ0(eM(W)), where
eM(W) satisfies (IR) as an equality: eM(W)Ψ0(eM(W)) - Ψ(eM (W)) = W.

34



More intriguing information

1. Dendritic Inhibition Enhances Neural Coding Properties
2. Disturbing the fiscal theory of the price level: Can it fit the eu-15?
3. The value-added of primary schools: what is it really measuring?
4. The name is absent
5. Behavioural Characteristics and Financial Distress
6. Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region
7. The name is absent
8. Examining Variations of Prominent Features in Genre Classification
9. LAND-USE EVALUATION OF KOCAELI UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS AREA
10. Julkinen T&K-rahoitus ja sen vaikutus yrityksiin - Analyysi metalli- ja elektroniikkateollisuudesta