ANTI-COMPETITIVE FINANCIAL CONTRACTING: THE DESIGN OF FINANCIAL CLAIMS.



Appendix: Proof of Lemma 1

Substitute RbH = RbL + Ψ0(e) throughout and write the first order conditions
for e and
RbL :

(1) L = RH - Rl - Ψ0(e) - 00(e) + λ [eΨ00(e)] = 0

(2)RL = -1 + λ 0 and (-1 + λ)RbL = 0

where λ is the Lagrange multiplier for the (IR) constraint.

(i) If (IR) does not bind at the optimum, then λ =0 and eM is determined
by
RH - RL = Ψ0(eM) + eMΨ00(eM). From Ψ00(e)>0 and the definition of the
first best effort e*, it follows e < e*. As (IR) is slack, λ = 0 and thus RL = 0.
For this to be the case, the level of effort must satisfy: eMΨ0(eM) -Ψ(eM) W,
i.e. it must be
W W1.

(ii) Suppose instead that W>W1. Then the contract in (i) cannot be the
solution to the program, as it fails to satisfy (IR). Then, either
RbH or RbL must
be raised. As
eM < e*, it is optimal to raise only the entrepreneur’s payment
in the high state, so as to raise his e
ffort. Therefore, RbH = Ψ0(eM(W)), where
eM(W) satisfies (IR) as an equality: eM(W)Ψ0(eM(W)) - Ψ(eM (W)) = W.

34



More intriguing information

1. Human Development and Regional Disparities in Iran:A Policy Model
2. Rent-Seeking in Noxious Weed Regulations: Evidence from US States
3. CGE modelling of the resources boom in Indonesia and Australia using TERM
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The Mathematical Components of Engineering
7. Infrastructure Investment in Network Industries: The Role of Incentive Regulation and Regulatory Independence
8. A Rare Presentation of Crohn's Disease
9. Design and investigation of scalable multicast recursive protocols for wired and wireless ad hoc networks
10. Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates