Table 6: CATALUNYA
Dependent variable: FDIP
Method of estimation: LSDV (with White correction)
Fixed effect by sector
Values in brackets: Standard Error
|
1________________ |
2___________ |
3___________ |
4__________ |
5____________ |
6____________ |
7___________ |
8____________ | |
|
C |
-71.24 (42.83) |
-27.85*** (8.19) |
-27.32 (16.39) |
-16.76*** (6.17) |
-31.74*** (9.55) |
-19.54** (5.60) |
-14.74** (5.74) |
-6.44 (10.72) |
|
Daverage |
10.02** |
10.24** (3.95) |
9.51** (4.15) |
11.25*** |
10.31*** |
10..06** (1.55) |
10.15** |
11.90*** (4.35) |
|
rproduc |
2.00* (1.12) |
0.23 (0.42) |
0.12 (0.42) |
0.21 (0.43) |
0.24 (0.41) |
0.23 (0.41) |
0.065 (0.44) | |
|
ULBV |
62.54 (39.42) |
-7.84 (11.88) | ||||||
|
GDPP |
1.49*** |
1.95*** | ||||||
|
EXPORTP |
3.40*** (1.14) |
5.00 (3.62) | ||||||
|
FBCFP |
-5.67 (5.59) | |||||||
|
HCP |
472.92*** (148.43) |
303.30 (298.90) | ||||||
|
HRSTV |
1.17*** | |||||||
|
RDP |
69896*** (24441) | |||||||
|
Adj R- |
0.45 |
0.57 |
0.55 |
0.59 |
0.57 |
0.56 |
0.58 |
0.60 |
|
N. Obs._______ |
42 |
48 ~ |
42 |
48 ^ |
48 ' |
48 ~~ |
48 ~ |
48 ^ |
***Level of significance 1 %, ** 5%. *10%
Table 7: BADEN-WÜRTTEMBERG
Dependent variable: FDIP
Method of estimation: LSDV (with White correction)
Fixed effect by sector
Values in brackets: Standard Error
|
1_________________ |
2__________ |
3_____________ |
4__________ |
5____________ |
6___________ |
7__________ |
8_____________ | |
|
C |
0.412*** |
-0.51*** (0.17) |
-0.55*** (0.19) |
-0.61*** (0.20) |
-0.54* (0.27) |
-0.49 (0.44) |
-0.52* (0.18) |
-0.35 (0.37)________ |
|
Daverage |
0.13*** |
0.13*** |
0.13*** |
0.13*** |
0.13*** |
0.13*** |
0.13*** (0.02)________ | |
|
rproduc |
0.0003 (0.0006) | |||||||
|
ULBV |
-0.49*** (0.14) |
- 0.26** (0.10) |
-0.27** (0.10) |
-0.27** (0.10) |
-0.27** (0.10) |
-0.27*** (0.10) |
-0.25** (0.12) |
-0.27*** (0.09)________ |
|
GDPP |
0.02*** (0.005) |
0.03*** (0.007) |
0.05** |
0.037 |
0.04 (0.03) |
0.02** |
0.02** (0.009) | |
|
EXPORTP |
9.81 E-06 | |||||||
|
FBCFP |
-0.07 (0.08) |
-0.07 (0.09) |
-0.07 (0.09) | |||||
|
HCP |
-2.21 (7.25) |
-3.14 (6.75) | ||||||
|
HRSTV |
0.003 | |||||||
|
RDP |
118.8 (330.6) | |||||||
|
Adj R- |
0.67 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
0.87 |
0.89 |
|
N. Obs______ |
35 ^ |
35 ^ |
35 ~ |
35 ~ |
35 ^ |
35 ^ |
35 ^ |
35 ~ |
***Level of significance 1 %, ** 5%. *10%
17
More intriguing information
1. Cross border cooperation –promoter of tourism development2. The name is absent
3. Return Predictability and Stock Market Crashes in a Simple Rational Expectations Model
4. The Role of Land Retirement Programs for Management of Water Resources
5. Environmental Regulation, Market Power and Price Discrimination in the Agricultural Chemical Industry
6. Towards a Strategy for Improving Agricultural Inputs Markets in Africa
7. Auctions in an outcome-based payment scheme to reward ecological services in agriculture – Conception, implementation and results
8. The name is absent
9. A Pure Test for the Elasticity of Yield Spreads
10. Update to a program for saving a model fit as a dataset