Evidence on the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Three European Regions



Table 6: CATALUNYA

Dependent variable: FDIP

Method of estimation: LSDV (with White correction)

Fixed effect by sector

Values in brackets: Standard Error

1________________

2___________

3___________

4__________

5____________

6____________

7___________

8____________

C

-71.24

(42.83)

-27.85***

(8.19)

-27.32

(16.39)

-16.76***

(6.17)

-31.74***

(9.55)

-19.54**

(5.60)

-14.74**

(5.74)

-6.44

(10.72)

Daverage

10.02**
(4.73)

10.24**

(3.95)

9.51**

(4.15)

11.25***
(4.09)

10.31***
(4.01)

10..06**

(1.55)

10.15**
(3.75)

11.90***

(4.35)

rproduc

2.00*

(1.12)

0.23

(0.42)

0.12

(0.42)

0.21

(0.43)

0.24

(0.41)

0.23

(0.41)

0.065

(0.44)

ULBV

62.54

(39.42)

-7.84

(11.88)

GDPP

1.49***
(0.50)

1.95***
(0.74)

EXPORTP

3.40***

(1.14)

5.00

(3.62)

FBCFP

-5.67

(5.59)

HCP

472.92***

(148.43)

303.30

(298.90)

HRSTV

1.17***
(0.355)

RDP

69896***

(24441)

Adj R-
squared_______

0.45

0.57

0.55

0.59

0.57

0.56

0.58

0.60

N. Obs._______

42

48       ~

42

48         ^

48         '

48       ~~

48      ~

48        ^

***Level of significance 1 %, ** 5%. *10%

Table 7: BADEN-WÜRTTEMBERG

Dependent variable: FDIP

Method of estimation: LSDV (with White correction)

Fixed effect by sector

Values in brackets: Standard Error

1_________________

2__________

3_____________

4__________

5____________

6___________

7__________

8_____________

C

0.412***
(0.05)

-0.51***

(0.17)

-0.55***

(0.19)

-0.61***

(0.20)

-0.54*

(0.27)

-0.49

(0.44)

-0.52*

(0.18)

-0.35

(0.37)________

Daverage

0.13***
(0.02)

0.13***
(0.02)

0.13***
(0.02)

0.13***
(0.02)

0.13***
(0.02)

0.13***
(0.03)

0.13***

(0.02)________

rproduc

0.0003

(0.0006)

ULBV

-0.49***

(0.14)

- 0.26**

(0.10)

-0.27**

(0.10)

-0.27**

(0.10)

-0.27**

(0.10)

-0.27***

(0.10)

-0.25**

(0.12)

-0.27***

(0.09)________

GDPP

0.02***

(0.005)

0.03***

(0.007)

0.05**
(0.02)

0.037
(0.033)

0.04

(0.03)

0.02**
(0.01)

0.02**

(0.009)

EXPORTP

9.81 E-06
(2.18 E-06)

FBCFP

-0.07

(0.08)

-0.07

(0.09)

-0.07

(0.09)

HCP

-2.21

(7.25)

-3.14

(6.75)

HRSTV

0.003
(0.008)

RDP

118.8

(330.6)

Adj R-
squared______

0.67

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.87

0.89

N. Obs______

35        ^

35        ^

35      ~

35       ~

35         ^

35        ^

35        ^

35     ~

***Level of significance 1 %, ** 5%. *10%

17



More intriguing information

1. Correlation Analysis of Financial Contagion: What One Should Know Before Running a Test
2. The name is absent
3. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS
4. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
5. The name is absent
6. Handling the measurement error problem by means of panel data: Moment methods applied on firm data
7. Measuring Semantic Similarity by Latent Relational Analysis
8. Parent child interaction in Nigerian families: conversation analysis, context and culture
9. Initial Public Offerings and Venture Capital in Germany
10. The Functions of Postpartum Depression
11. The Employment Impact of Differences in Dmand and Production
12. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF COTTON AND PEANUT RESEARCH IN SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
13. The name is absent
14. The name is absent
15. The Impact of Optimal Tariffs and Taxes on Agglomeration
16. TOWARDS THE ZERO ACCIDENT GOAL: ASSISTING THE FIRST OFFICER MONITOR AND CHALLENGE CAPTAIN ERRORS
17. How Low Business Tax Rates Attract Multinational Headquarters: Municipality-Level Evidence from Germany
18. Reputations, Market Structure, and the Choice of Quality Assurance Systems in the Food Industry
19. Direct observations of the kinetics of migrating T-cells suggest active retention by endothelial cells with continual bidirectional migration
20. The name is absent