Table 6: CATALUNYA
Dependent variable: FDIP
Method of estimation: LSDV (with White correction)
Fixed effect by sector
Values in brackets: Standard Error
|
1________________ |
2___________ |
3___________ |
4__________ |
5____________ |
6____________ |
7___________ |
8____________ | |
|
C |
-71.24 (42.83) |
-27.85*** (8.19) |
-27.32 (16.39) |
-16.76*** (6.17) |
-31.74*** (9.55) |
-19.54** (5.60) |
-14.74** (5.74) |
-6.44 (10.72) |
|
Daverage |
10.02** |
10.24** (3.95) |
9.51** (4.15) |
11.25*** |
10.31*** |
10..06** (1.55) |
10.15** |
11.90*** (4.35) |
|
rproduc |
2.00* (1.12) |
0.23 (0.42) |
0.12 (0.42) |
0.21 (0.43) |
0.24 (0.41) |
0.23 (0.41) |
0.065 (0.44) | |
|
ULBV |
62.54 (39.42) |
-7.84 (11.88) | ||||||
|
GDPP |
1.49*** |
1.95*** | ||||||
|
EXPORTP |
3.40*** (1.14) |
5.00 (3.62) | ||||||
|
FBCFP |
-5.67 (5.59) | |||||||
|
HCP |
472.92*** (148.43) |
303.30 (298.90) | ||||||
|
HRSTV |
1.17*** | |||||||
|
RDP |
69896*** (24441) | |||||||
|
Adj R- |
0.45 |
0.57 |
0.55 |
0.59 |
0.57 |
0.56 |
0.58 |
0.60 |
|
N. Obs._______ |
42 |
48 ~ |
42 |
48 ^ |
48 ' |
48 ~~ |
48 ~ |
48 ^ |
***Level of significance 1 %, ** 5%. *10%
Table 7: BADEN-WÜRTTEMBERG
Dependent variable: FDIP
Method of estimation: LSDV (with White correction)
Fixed effect by sector
Values in brackets: Standard Error
|
1_________________ |
2__________ |
3_____________ |
4__________ |
5____________ |
6___________ |
7__________ |
8_____________ | |
|
C |
0.412*** |
-0.51*** (0.17) |
-0.55*** (0.19) |
-0.61*** (0.20) |
-0.54* (0.27) |
-0.49 (0.44) |
-0.52* (0.18) |
-0.35 (0.37)________ |
|
Daverage |
0.13*** |
0.13*** |
0.13*** |
0.13*** |
0.13*** |
0.13*** |
0.13*** (0.02)________ | |
|
rproduc |
0.0003 (0.0006) | |||||||
|
ULBV |
-0.49*** (0.14) |
- 0.26** (0.10) |
-0.27** (0.10) |
-0.27** (0.10) |
-0.27** (0.10) |
-0.27*** (0.10) |
-0.25** (0.12) |
-0.27*** (0.09)________ |
|
GDPP |
0.02*** (0.005) |
0.03*** (0.007) |
0.05** |
0.037 |
0.04 (0.03) |
0.02** |
0.02** (0.009) | |
|
EXPORTP |
9.81 E-06 | |||||||
|
FBCFP |
-0.07 (0.08) |
-0.07 (0.09) |
-0.07 (0.09) | |||||
|
HCP |
-2.21 (7.25) |
-3.14 (6.75) | ||||||
|
HRSTV |
0.003 | |||||||
|
RDP |
118.8 (330.6) | |||||||
|
Adj R- |
0.67 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
0.87 |
0.89 |
|
N. Obs______ |
35 ^ |
35 ^ |
35 ~ |
35 ~ |
35 ^ |
35 ^ |
35 ^ |
35 ~ |
***Level of significance 1 %, ** 5%. *10%
17
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Program Semantics and Classical Logic
3. Critical Race Theory and Education: Racism and antiracism in educational theory and praxis David Gillborn*
4. Institutions, Social Norms, and Bargaining Power: An Analysis of Individual Leisure Time in Couple Households
5. A Computational Model of Children's Semantic Memory
6. THE ECONOMICS OF COMPETITION IN HEALTH INSURANCE- THE IRISH CASE STUDY.
7. Julkinen T&K-rahoitus ja sen vaikutus yrityksiin - Analyysi metalli- ja elektroniikkateollisuudesta
8. Sex differences in the structure and stability of children’s playground social networks and their overlap with friendship relations
9. PERFORMANCE PREMISES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES FROM PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA
10. The name is absent