σ -αq 1 1+a (1 -σ )
1—σ — q+τ I ασ
(1 -τ)( σ+a (1 -σ ))
aσ
)’
and after simplifications, the second term of the trace becomes
—q
—ql τ
(τ( σ+α-ασ )
—
+ 1)∙
As for the first additive term of the trace, Ω, it can be rewritten as follows:
σ Λ _ l(1+β)α (1—q)α-2
1—σ y1 A[lβ(1—a)]α
1 l (1+β )α (1—q)α-2
1 A [ lβ (1—a )] α
(45)
The big term that is common to the nominator and the denominator can be identified,
by replacing 1 — q by its steady state expression, as (1 — τ)/(1 — q).
After simplifications, Ω becomes:
— [ τ(1 — <)] + α<
—q + τ
As a result, we obtain the final expression for the trace J:
trJ =
— [1 — q(2 — α + a )1 — <7(1 — α )
—q + τ
(46)
The final part of this proof consists in comparing ∖trJ∣ and ∣1 + DetJ∣, i.e.,
ισ [1—q(2—a+α )] —9(1—a)
—q+τ
I and I I.
l l —q+τ 1
This depends on σ, the magnitude of q, which itself depends on the value of the parameters
ρ and l, and on whether ∖DetJ∣ ^ 1 (conditions 1 and 2, established above).
When σ > 1, it can be shown that:
• If q ∈
2 —1
______σ
2 a» (1—σ )
, 1 , then either ɪ [1 — q(2
— α + a )1 < 0 or
■—:[1 — <(2 — α + a)1 > 1 and, therefore, ∖trJ∣ > 11 + DetJ∣. The steady state is a
45
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Mergers and the changing landscape of commercial banking (Part II)
3. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?
4. Apprenticeships in the UK: from the industrial-relation via market-led and social inclusion models
5. Migrant Business Networks and FDI
6. Food Prices and Overweight Patterns in Italy
7. Outsourcing, Complementary Innovations and Growth
8. Surveying the welfare state: challenges, policy development and causes of resilience
9. Who runs the IFIs?
10. Ongoing Emergence: A Core Concept in Epigenetic Robotics