PROVIDE Project Technical Paper 2005:1
February 2005
Table 2: Cross-tabulation of employment data
|
IES 2000 ÷ LFS 2000:2 Ψ |
Not |
Snr officials |
Professionals |
Assoc profess |
Clerks |
Service |
Skilled agric |
Crafts & |
Machine |
Elementary |
Domestic |
Unspecified |
Total |
"Correctly" |
|
Not applicable |
77,472 |
_________15 |
_________14 |
_________51 |
________40 |
________58 |
________84 |
________89 |
________84 |
________164 |
________65 |
1,253 |
79,389 |
97.60% |
|
Snr officials______ |
________196 |
_______706 |
__________2 |
__________2 |
___________3 |
__________2 |
________1_ |
________1_ |
__________2 |
__________6 |
_______921 |
76.70% | ||
|
Professionals |
________74 |
________1_ |
_______759 |
__________7 |
________1_ |
___________3 |
________1_ |
__________2 |
_________14 |
862 |
88.10% | |||
|
Assoc profess |
________195 |
_________2 |
__________13 |
1,860 |
___________3 |
___________8 |
__________2 |
________1_ |
__________2 |
________46 |
2,132 |
87.20% | ||
|
Clerks___________ |
________123 |
____________5 |
1,777 |
_________4 |
________1_ |
__________2 |
________1_ |
___________3 |
________57 |
1,973 |
90.10% | |||
|
Service workers |
_______608 |
_________2 |
____________3 |
____________5 |
__________2 |
2,255 |
__________2 |
________1_ |
_______________1 |
___________8 |
_______________1 |
_________65 |
2,953 |
76.40% |
|
Skilled agric |
_______306 |
________1_ |
________1_ |
________1_ |
__________6 |
_______805 |
_______________1 |
_________16 |
________1_ |
________24 |
1,162 |
69.30% | ||
|
Crafts & trade |
_______527 |
___________3 |
________1_ |
___________3 |
_________2 |
2,826 |
____________5 |
_________12 |
_________63 |
3,442 |
82.10% | |||
|
Machine operators |
_______203 |
_________4 |
________1_ |
___________3 |
__________2 |
_________10 |
2,494 |
________23 |
________64 |
2,804 |
88.90% | |||
|
Elementary______ |
1,000 |
_________1_ |
__________2 |
__________6 |
________8_ |
________31 |
__________9 |
_________15 |
4,643 |
________20 |
________135 |
5,870 |
79.10% | |
|
Domestic workers |
________165 |
________1_ |
__________7 |
________1_ |
________1_ |
_________17 |
2,309 |
________46 |
2,547 |
90.70% | ||||
|
Unspecified_____ |
_________10 |
________1_ |
__________2 |
_______________1 |
_______________1 |
_______________1 |
_______________1 |
__________2 |
_______________1 |
_________25 |
________45 |
55.60% | ||
|
Total___________ |
80,879 |
_______735 |
_______794 |
1,936 |
1,839 |
2,346 |
_______935 |
2,943 |
2,604 |
4,894 |
2,397 |
1,798 |
104,100 | |
|
'(Oeieciy' categorised______ |
95.80% |
96.10% |
95.60% |
96.10% |
96.60% |
96.10% |
86.10% |
96.00% |
95.80% |
94.90% |
96.30% |
1.40% |
14
© PROVIDE Project
More intriguing information
1. Computational Experiments with the Fuzzy Love and Romance2. Ahorro y crecimiento: alguna evidencia para la economía argentina, 1970-2004
3. Stakeholder Activism, Managerial Entrenchment, and the Congruence of Interests between Shareholders and Stakeholders
4. Integration, Regional Specialization and Growth Differentials in EU Acceding Countries: Evidence from Hungary
5. New Evidence on the Puzzles. Results from Agnostic Identification on Monetary Policy and Exchange Rates.
6. Foreign direct investment in the Indian telecommunications sector
7. Cyber-pharmacies and emerging concerns on marketing drugs Online
8. Bargaining Power and Equilibrium Consumption
9. EFFICIENCY LOSS AND TRADABLE PERMITS
10. The name is absent