Creating a 2000 IES-LFS Database in Stata



PROVIDE Project Technical Paper 2005:1

February 2005


Poswell (2003) has no explanation for the discrepancy, apart from reporting or calculation
errors. The figure for total housing expenditure will not be used in further calculations, hence
no attempt is made to try and find the error.

Variable |

-------------+

P0303total |

P0303total~K |
diff |

Obs

Mean

Std. Dev.

Min

Max

26265

354.3109

1534.388

0

190300

26265

360.7422

1539.738

0

190300

26265

6.431296

112.0424

-100

4544

Section 3.4 of Part 3 covers annual housing costs. These are costs that are typically made
only once (if at all) in a given calendar year. Expense items in this category include
alterations, improvements, and transfer costs. As seen in the Stata output table below, there is
an average difference of R16.72 between the calculated and reported total. These differences
occur in 171 of the observations. Closer inspection suggests that most of the differences are
simply calculation errors. For some observations the total annual housing expenditure was
reported as zero despite having reported expenses that supposedly make up the total. This
explains many of the large differences. The total annual housing expenditure figure will not
be used further, and hence no attempt is made to correct the discrepancies that exist.

Variable |
-------------+-

Obs

Mean

Std. Dev.

Min

Max

P0304total~K |

26265

561.9166

5673.867

0

266200

P0304total |

26265

545.1938

5642.526

0

266200

diff |

26265

16.72283

602.733

-2889

67400

Finally, section 3.5 of Part 3 covers expenditure on holiday accommodation. As shown in
the Stata output tables below the calculated total differs only slightly from the reported total.
The difference cannot be explained properly, but only occurs in 180 of the observations. At
this point nothing is done about the problem.

Variable |

Obs

Mean

Std. Dev.

Min

Max

-------------+-

--------

P03052tota~K |

26835

186.5814

2649.756

0

235000

P03052total |

26835

186.6786

2649.828

0

235000

diff |

26835

-.0971492

32.81482

-4000

3002

Variable |

Obs

Mean

Std. Dev.

Min

Max

--------

P03052tota~K |

180

339.3667

1443.965

0

10002

P03052total |

180

353.85

1461.898

0

10000

diff |

180

-14.48333

401.5173

-4000

3002

Part 5 covers expenditure on food items. All totals were recalculated and compared to the
reported totals. As shown in the Stata output table below, no substantial errors were found.
The largest difference occurred in question 5.3 (
P0503tot*). The error is small enough to
safely ignore and is likely to be a calculation error.

A more serious problem in the food expenditure section is that about 351 observations
(1.3% of the dataset) report zero food expenditure. Given that respondents should also report

45

© PROVIDE Project



More intriguing information

1. Testing for One-Factor Models versus Stochastic Volatility Models
2. Explaining Growth in Dutch Agriculture: Prices, Public R&D, and Technological Change
3. Restructuring of industrial economies in countries in transition: Experience of Ukraine
4. The name is absent
5. THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURE
6. The name is absent
7. THE MEXICAN HOG INDUSTRY: MOVING BEYOND 2003
8. Proceedings from the ECFIN Workshop "The budgetary implications of structural reforms" - Brussels, 2 December 2005
9. Gerontocracy in Motion? – European Cross-Country Evidence on the Labor Market Consequences of Population Ageing
10. THE WELFARE EFFECTS OF CONSUMING A CANCER PREVENTION DIET