PROVIDE Project Technical Paper 2005:1
February 2005
Table 10: Forming deciles using income and expenditure
|
Exp decile 1 |
Exp decile |
Exp decile |
Exp decile |
Exp decile |
Exp decile |
Exp decile 7 |
Exp decile |
Exp decile |
Exp decile 10 | |
|
Inc decile 1 |
1.791 |
312 |
_______132 |
________84 |
_______84 |
________54 |
________59 |
_______46 |
________41 |
________45 |
|
Inc decile 2 |
525 |
1.460 |
499 |
_______137 |
_______66 |
_______42 |
_______22 |
_________18 |
____B |
____________5 |
|
Inc decile 3 |
________165 |
510 |
1.291 |
376 |
________95 |
________51 |
_______24 |
________17 |
________19 |
___________3 |
|
Inc decile 4 |
________59 |
_______147 |
422 |
1.330 |
373 |
_______92 |
_______39 |
_________18 |
________14 |
________10 |
|
Inc decile 5 |
________48 |
________101 |
_______153 |
436 |
1.387 |
402 |
_______77 |
_______44 |
________14 |
_______________1 |
|
Inc decile 6 |
_________14 |
__________55 |
_______69 |
_______137 |
380 |
1.415 |
412 |
_______60 |
________19 |
_________15 |
|
Inc decile 7 |
_________14 |
________18 |
_______28 |
_______66 |
_______140 |
387 |
1.490 |
394 |
________61 |
_______24 |
|
Inc decile 8 |
____________5 |
_________7 |
________17 |
_______37 |
_______57 |
________125 |
385 |
1,613 |
344 |
________33 |
|
Inc decile 9 |
_______________1 |
_________11 |
___________8 |
________12 |
_______27 |
_______44 |
_______98 |
359 |
1.800 |
285 |
|
Inc decile 10 |
_______________1 |
___________3 |
____________5 |
____B |
_________9 |
________16 |
________52 |
297 |
2.200 | |
|
Total obs. |
2,622 |
2,622 |
2,622 |
2,620 |
2,622 |
2,621 |
2,622 |
2,621 |
2,622 |
2,621 |
|
Diagonal____ |
68.3% |
55.7% |
49.2% |
50.8% |
52.9% |
54.0% |
56.8% |
61.5% |
68.6% |
83.9% |
|
Shaded band |
88.3% |
87.0% |
84.4% |
81.8% |
81.6% |
84.1% |
87.2% |
90.3% |
93.1% |
94.8% |
Note: Analytic weights assumed (variable weight)
4.2. Adjusting the data (adjustments.do )
Do-file adjustments.do creates final person- and household level files from which the various
household- and factor-related SAM sub-matrices are extracted. The person-level file is
created by merging the IES 2000 and LFS 2000:2 files. This allows the user the option to
either use the IES 2000 employment data or the LFS 2000:2 employment data for the factor-
related sub-matrices. Some adjustments, which are discussed below, are also made to the
household-level IES 2000 file. Figure 12 shows the structure of adjustments.do and its sub-
do-files.
56
© PROVIDE Project
More intriguing information
1. Does adult education at upper secondary level influence annual wage earnings?2. Fiscal Insurance and Debt Management in OECD Economies
3. The name is absent
4. An institutional analysis of sasi laut in Maluku, Indonesia
5. Strategic Investment and Market Integration
6. The name is absent
7. CREDIT SCORING, LOAN PRICING, AND FARM BUSINESS PERFORMANCE
8. Regional differentiation in the Russian federation: A cluster-based typification
9. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
10. The name is absent