PROVIDE Project Technical Paper 2005:1
February 2005
Table 10: Forming deciles using income and expenditure
|
Exp decile 1 |
Exp decile |
Exp decile |
Exp decile |
Exp decile |
Exp decile |
Exp decile 7 |
Exp decile |
Exp decile |
Exp decile 10 | |
|
Inc decile 1 |
1.791 |
312 |
_______132 |
________84 |
_______84 |
________54 |
________59 |
_______46 |
________41 |
________45 |
|
Inc decile 2 |
525 |
1.460 |
499 |
_______137 |
_______66 |
_______42 |
_______22 |
_________18 |
____B |
____________5 |
|
Inc decile 3 |
________165 |
510 |
1.291 |
376 |
________95 |
________51 |
_______24 |
________17 |
________19 |
___________3 |
|
Inc decile 4 |
________59 |
_______147 |
422 |
1.330 |
373 |
_______92 |
_______39 |
_________18 |
________14 |
________10 |
|
Inc decile 5 |
________48 |
________101 |
_______153 |
436 |
1.387 |
402 |
_______77 |
_______44 |
________14 |
_______________1 |
|
Inc decile 6 |
_________14 |
__________55 |
_______69 |
_______137 |
380 |
1.415 |
412 |
_______60 |
________19 |
_________15 |
|
Inc decile 7 |
_________14 |
________18 |
_______28 |
_______66 |
_______140 |
387 |
1.490 |
394 |
________61 |
_______24 |
|
Inc decile 8 |
____________5 |
_________7 |
________17 |
_______37 |
_______57 |
________125 |
385 |
1,613 |
344 |
________33 |
|
Inc decile 9 |
_______________1 |
_________11 |
___________8 |
________12 |
_______27 |
_______44 |
_______98 |
359 |
1.800 |
285 |
|
Inc decile 10 |
_______________1 |
___________3 |
____________5 |
____B |
_________9 |
________16 |
________52 |
297 |
2.200 | |
|
Total obs. |
2,622 |
2,622 |
2,622 |
2,620 |
2,622 |
2,621 |
2,622 |
2,621 |
2,622 |
2,621 |
|
Diagonal____ |
68.3% |
55.7% |
49.2% |
50.8% |
52.9% |
54.0% |
56.8% |
61.5% |
68.6% |
83.9% |
|
Shaded band |
88.3% |
87.0% |
84.4% |
81.8% |
81.6% |
84.1% |
87.2% |
90.3% |
93.1% |
94.8% |
Note: Analytic weights assumed (variable weight)
4.2. Adjusting the data (adjustments.do )
Do-file adjustments.do creates final person- and household level files from which the various
household- and factor-related SAM sub-matrices are extracted. The person-level file is
created by merging the IES 2000 and LFS 2000:2 files. This allows the user the option to
either use the IES 2000 employment data or the LFS 2000:2 employment data for the factor-
related sub-matrices. Some adjustments, which are discussed below, are also made to the
household-level IES 2000 file. Figure 12 shows the structure of adjustments.do and its sub-
do-files.
56
© PROVIDE Project
More intriguing information
1. The Mathematical Components of Engineering2. Exchange Rate Uncertainty and Trade Growth - A Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear (Forecasting) Models
3. El impacto espacial de las economías de aglomeración y su efecto sobre la estructura urbana.El caso de la industria en Barcelona, 1986-1996
4. Valuing Farm Financial Information
5. INTERACTION EFFECTS OF PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND PRICE SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR U.S. COTTON
6. Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development
7. BARRIERS TO EFFICIENCY AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF TOWNSHIP-VILLAGE ENTERPRISES
8. The demand for urban transport: An application of discrete choice model for Cadiz
9. Om Økonomi, matematik og videnskabelighed - et bud på provokation
10. FDI Implications of Recent European Court of Justice Decision on Corporation Tax Matters