Creating a 2000 IES-LFS Database in Stata



PROVIDE Project Technical Paper 2005:1
individual reported zero income in the one survey and non-zero income in the other, the
non-zero entry was assumed to be the correct one.

February 2005


Next, variable diffp, defined as the percentage difference (in absolute terms)
between the LFS wage (
inclabp_lfs) and the IES wage (inclabp_ies), was constructed.
If this difference was less than 30% the larger of the two income levels was chosen as
the correct factor income. Initially there were about 24,700 workers (unweighted) in the
LFS, and 23,221 in the IES. When considering all people reporting income from labour
in a combined IES-LFS survey, there were almost 27,000 workers. For the majority of
these (approximately 23,000 observations) the difference between IES and LFS wage
income was less than 30%.

The remainder were evaluated record by record, following the basic rule of thumb
that the larger of the two incomes is correct. However, in instances where it was
reasonable to believe that the larger entry was incorrect, the smaller entry was select.
For example, in many instances the one figure was exactly 10, 100, or 1000 times the
other, which clearly suggests an error in the data capturing process. In such instances
the more realistic figure was selected, given the average income of the factor group, the
education level of the respondent, the total household income or expenditure
(unadjusted), as well as the reported income levels of other members of the household.
In all instances where it was still unclear whether to use the IES or LFS data, the one
that would be more successful at closing the gap between total household income and
expenditure was selected. Of the 4000 observations examined there were 95 cases
where the LFS income was larger, but the IES was used, and 59 cases where the IES
was larger, but the LFS was used. For the rest the larger of the two seemed more
appropriate.

The new income variable created was initially saved as inclabp_new, but later
renamed
inclabp_old when inclabp_new was scaled upwards to match the household-
level variable
inclab. This is discussed in section 4.2.4.

65

© PROVIDE Project



More intriguing information

1. Governance Control Mechanisms in Portuguese Agricultural Credit Cooperatives
2. The name is absent
3. Developments and Development Directions of Electronic Trade Platforms in US and European Agri-Food Markets: Impact on Sector Organization
4. Tastes, castes, and culture: The influence of society on preferences
5. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES IN TENNESSEE ON WATER USE AND CONTROL - AGRICULTURAL PHASES
6. Antidote Stocking at Hospitals in North Palestine
7. The name is absent
8. THE EFFECT OF MARKETING COOPERATIVES ON COST-REDUCING PROCESS INNOVATION ACTIVITY
9. Improving behaviour classification consistency: a technique from biological taxonomy
10. MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS
11. THE WELFARE EFFECTS OF CONSUMING A CANCER PREVENTION DIET
12. Correlation Analysis of Financial Contagion: What One Should Know Before Running a Test
13. Competition In or For the Field: Which is Better
14. The name is absent
15. Social Irresponsibility in Management
16. Shifting Identities and Blurring Boundaries: The Emergence of Third Space Professionals in UK Higher Education
17. The name is absent
18. Testing Hypotheses in an I(2) Model with Applications to the Persistent Long Swings in the Dmk/$ Rate
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent