Table 2: Results of the One-Way Fixed Effect Panel Estimation Procedure
|
Variable |
Estimate |
Standard |
t |
Pr > ItI |
|
CS1 |
-1.74 |
13 |
-1.34 |
0.1838 |
|
CS2 |
-3.72 |
1.596 |
-2.33 |
0.0214 |
|
CS3 |
1.49 |
1.46 |
10.16 |
<.0001 |
|
CS4 |
-5.29 |
1.96 |
-2.7 |
0.0079 |
|
CS5 |
-9.16 |
1.42 |
-0.06 |
0.95 |
|
CS6 |
2.74 |
1.04 |
2.63 |
0.0095 |
|
________CS7________ |
3.28 |
1.25 |
2.63 |
0.0095 |
|
Intercept |
5.28 |
1.94 |
2.72 |
0.0074 |
|
Dummy Variable, |
6.66 |
6.32 |
1.05 |
0.2938 |
|
Dummy Variable, |
-5.79 |
223 |
-2.57 |
0.0111 |
|
Exchange Rate |
-9.33 |
697 |
-1.34 |
0.1828 |
|
Per Capita GDP |
0.0074 |
0.00129 |
5.76 |
<.0001 |
|
R2 |
082 |
More intriguing information
1. Survey of Literature on Covered and Uncovered Interest Parities2. The name is absent
3. Micro-strategies of Contextualization Cross-national Transfer of Socially Responsible Investment
4. Smith and Rawls Share a Room
5. Rural-Urban Economic Disparities among China’s Elderly
6. The name is absent
7. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent