Biological Control of Giant Reed (Arundo donax): Economic Aspects

revenue. The overall conclusion of this report is a favorable benefit-cost ratio, the creation of
jobs, and added economic activity.

References

Bell, Gary P. 1997. Ecology and Management of Arundo donax, and Approaches to Riparian
Habitat Restoration in Southern California. In Brock, J. H., Wade, M., Pysek, P., and
Green, D. (Eds.): Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe. Blackhuys
Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp. 103-13.

Griffin, Ronald C. 2006. Water Resource Economics. Cambridge, MS: The MIT Press.

Goolsby, John A. 2008. Personal Communication. Entomologist. USDA-ARS. Weslaco, TX,
July 30, 2008.

Lacewell, Ronald D. 2008. Professor of Agricultural Economics. Personal Communication.
Texas A&M University. College Station, TX, February 15, 2008.

Lacewell, Ronald D., and Roger Freeman. 1990. ABE: Agricultural Benefit Estimator.
Department of Agricultural Economics Contract Report, Texas A&M University, for
Corps of Engineers, Galveston.

Lacewell, Ronald D., Amy Purvis, Roger Freeman, Jerry Kazda, Devid Petit, Anil Rupasinghe,
John Sheppard, and Merritt Taylor. 1995. “Estimated South Main Channel Agricultural
Benefits Attributable to Drainage and Flood Control in Hidalgo and Willacy counties,
Texas.” Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College
Station, Texas. Final report submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Galveston.

Minnesota ImPLAN Group, Inc. 2004. IMPLAN Professional Version 2.0. User’s Guide,
Analysis Guide, Data Guide. Stillwater, Minnesota: Minnesota IMPLAN Group, Inc.

Rister, M.E ., Callie S. Rogers, R. D. Lacewell, J. R. Robinson, J. R. Ellis, and A. W. Sturdivant.
2008. “Economic Methodology for South Texas Irrigation Projects - RGIDECON^©.”
Texas Water Resources Institute TR-203 revised, College Station, Texas.

15

<<   12   13   14   15   16   >>

More intriguing information