Table 8.A Estimated resource use and costs per acre for field operations, Cauliflower, irrigated, fresh-market, two-row equipment,,
average yield, Louisiana, 1997.
OPERATION/ OPERATING INPUT |
SIZE/ |
TRACTOR |
PERF |
TIMES |
MT H |
TRACTOR COST |
EQUIP COST |
ALLOC LABOR |
OPERATING INPUT |
TOTAL | |||||
-D-I-R-E-C-T-- |
------ FIXED |
------- DIRECT |
------- FIXED |
-H-OU-R-S-- |
----C-O-S-T |
-A-M-O-U-N-T-- |
--P-RI-C-E-- |
----CO--ST- | |||||||
__-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- |
----dollars---- |
_-_-_-_--__--__ |
__d_o_l_l_a_r_s_ |
_-_-_--_-_-__- |
_d_o_l_la__rs__- |
_-_-_--_-_-__- | |||||||||
Lime (spread) |
cwt |
1.00 |
Jul |
6.6000 |
1.60 |
10.56 |
10.56 | ||||||||
Disk 2R |
6 ft |
4 3 |
0.570 |
1.00 |
Jul |
22..8899 |
11..4466 |
00..33 88 |
0.54 |
0.627 0.627 |
4.7 0 |
9.97 | |||
Disk 2R |
6 ft |
43 |
0.570 |
1.00 |
Aug |
0.54 |
4.70 |
9.97 | |||||||
Disk-pre-1-2R |
6 ft |
23 |
0.590 |
1.00 |
Aug |
2.17 |
0.98 |
0.49 |
0.70 |
0.649 |
4.87 |
9.21 | |||
Treflan |
3 pftt |
1.250 0 |
3.75 |
4.69 |
4.69 | ||||||||||
Hipper 1R |
2 3 |
1.530 |
1.0 0 |
Aug |
5.6 3 |
2.5 3 |
0.50 |
0.72 |
1.683 |
12.6 2 |
22.01 | ||||
lb |
800.000 0 |
0.12 |
96.00 |
96.00 | |||||||||||
Hipper 1R Veg Transplanter |
3 ft 1 row |
2 3 23 |
14 ..0530 00 |
1.0 0 1.00 |
Aug |
5.6 3 14.72 |
62..65 13 |
10..52 50 |
03.. 72 26 |
116 ..4680 03 |
12.6 2 123.00 |
22.01 148.84 | |||
Planting labor |
h1o0u0r |
20.000 0 |
7.50 |
150.00 |
150.00 | ||||||||||
Cauliflower plants |
85.0000 |
4.00 |
340.00 |
340.00 | |||||||||||
Furrow irrigation |
acin |
1.0 0 |
Aug |
6.88 |
55.5 0 |
2.000 |
15.0 0 |
2.0000 |
77.38 | ||||||
Other labor |
hour |
1.00 |
Aug |
4.0000 |
7.50 |
30.00 |
30.00 | ||||||||
BooAmmbsupsrhayer |
12 ft |
2 3 |
0.190 |
1.00 |
Sep |
0.7 0 |
0.3 1 |
0.26 |
0.28 |
0.209 |
1.5 7 |
0.250 0 |
13.88 |
3.47 |
3.12 3.47 |
Dipel CuBlutfifveartor 1R |
pt |
1.0000 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
3.00 | ||||||||||
3 pftt |
23 |
1.530 |
1.0 0 |
Se p |
5.6 3 |
2.5 3 |
0.40 |
0.57 |
1.683 |
12.6 2 |
1.0000 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 21.76 | |
Furrow irrigation |
acin |
1.00 |
Sep |
6.88 |
2.000 |
15.00 |
2.000 0 |
21.88 | |||||||
3 ft |
2 3 |
10 ..1539 00 |
1.00 |
Oct |
5.6 3 |
02.. 35 13 |
0.40 |
00..2578 |
1.683 |
12.62 |
21.76 | ||||
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
23 |
1.00 |
Oct |
0.70 |
0.26 |
0.209 |
1.57 |
3.12 | ||||||
Ambush |
pt |
0.250 0 |
13.88 |
3.47 |
3.47 | ||||||||||
DBiupfefler |
pt |
1.0000 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
3.00 | ||||||||||
pt |
1.0000 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 | |||||||||||
Cultivator 1R |
3 ft |
2 3 |
1.530 |
1.0 0 |
Oc t |
5.6 3 |
2.5 3 |
0.40 |
0.57 |
1.683 |
12.6 2 |
21.76 | |||
Furrow irrigation |
acin |
1.00 |
Oct |
6.88 |
2.000 |
15.00 |
2.000 0 |
21.88 | |||||||
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
2 3 |
0.190 |
1.00 |
Oct |
0.7 0 |
0.3 1 |
0.26 |
0.28 |
0.209 |
1.57 |
3.12 | |||
pt |
1.000 0 |
12.56 |
12.56 |
12.56 | |||||||||||
Crop oil |
pt |
2.0000 |
0.78 |
1.56 |
1.56 | ||||||||||
Blanching labor |
hour |
1.0 0 |
No v |
15.0000 |
7.50 |
112.50 |
112.50 | ||||||||
10 ft |
2 3 |
1.000 |
2.00 |
Nov |
7.3 6 |
3.3 1 |
0.80 |
2.86 |
2.20 0 |
16.5 0 |
30.82 | ||||
Harvest labor Packing labor |
hour |
1.00 |
Nov |
30.000 0 |
7.50 |
225.00 |
225.00 | ||||||||
hour |
1.00 |
Nov |
11.0000 |
7.50 |
82.50 |
82.50 | |||||||||
Packing boxes |
each |
1.00 |
Nov |
300.0000 |
1.10 |
330.00 |
330.00 | ||||||||
Pickup truck |
½ ton |
1.000 |
10.00 |
Nov |
401..53 68 |
33.63 |
10.000 |
75.0 0 |
150.19 | ||||||
6 ft |
4 3 |
0.570 |
1.00 |
Nov |
2.8 9 |
1.4 6 |
0.54 |
0.627 |
4.70 |
9.97 | |||||
TOTALS |
---6-3-.-2-0 - |
--2-8-.8--7 - |
--6-8.-8-8- |
--1-0-1.--55- |
-4-6-.1-7-2- |
--3-4-6-.-2-9 |
-1-4-1-2.--31- |
-2-0-21-.-0--9 | |||||||
INTEREST ON OPERATING CAPITAL |
38.82 | ||||||||||||||
UNALLOCATED LABOR |
0.00 | ||||||||||||||
TOTAL SPECIFIED COST |
2059.91 |
H-18
More intriguing information
1. Towards Teaching a Robot to Count Objects2. FUTURE TRADE RESEARCH AREAS THAT MATTER TO DEVELOPING COUNTRY POLICYMAKERS
3. Improvement of Access to Data Sets from the Official Statistics
4. The name is absent
5. Large-N and Large-T Properties of Panel Data Estimators and the Hausman Test
6. Rent-Seeking in Noxious Weed Regulations: Evidence from US States
7. The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective
8. Can we design a market for competitive health insurance? CHERE Discussion Paper No 53
9. Are Japanese bureaucrats politically stronger than farmers?: The political economy of Japan's rice set-aside program
10. Inflation Targeting and Nonlinear Policy Rules: The Case of Asymmetric Preferences (new title: The Fed's monetary policy rule and U.S. inflation: The case of asymmetric preferences)